Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pediatric traumatic brain injury as a risk factor for psychosis and psychotic symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yau, King-Chi, Revill, Grace, Blackman, Graham, Shaikh, Madiha, Bell, Vaughan·2024·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Psychosis is one of the most disabling psychiatric disorders. Pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) has been cited as a developmental risk factor for psychosis, however this association has never been assessed meta-analytically. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between pTBI and subsequent psychotic disorders/symptoms was performed. The study was pre-registered (CRD42022360772) adopting a random-effects model to estimate meta-analytic odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Paule–Mandel estimator. Subgroup (study location, study design, psychotic disorder v . subthreshold symptoms, assessment type, and adult v . adolescent onset) and meta-regression (quality of evidence) analyses were also performed. The robustness of findings was assessed through sensitivity analyses. The meta-analysis is available online as a computational notebook with an open dataset. Results: We identified 10 relevant studies and eight were included in the meta-analysis. Based on a pooled sample size of 479686, the pooled OR for the association between pTBI and psychosis outcomes was 1.80 (95% CI 1.11–2.95). There were no subgroup effects and no outliers. Both psychotic disorder and subthreshold symptoms were associated with pTBI. The overall association remained robust after removal of low-quality studies, however the OR reduced to 1.43 (95% CI 1.04–1.98). A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed the association was robust to removal of all but one study which changed the estimate to marginally non-significant. Conclusions: We report cautious meta-analytic evidence for a positive association between pTBI and future psychosis. New evidence will be key in determining long-term reliability of this finding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291723002878

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

1 more claim about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Popay, 2006, Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews, A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme Version, 1, b92
  2. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1235 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cegh.2018.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/eip.12228 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/schbul/sbx121 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1017/BrImp.2013.10 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0033291715000574 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1136/jnnp.2004.060475 · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.060475
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62036-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0706743716643741 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.300 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/schbul/sbr091 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.029 · DOI
  14. McGlashan, 2010, The psychosis-risk syndrome: Handbook for diagnosis and follow-up
  15. 10.1016/j.schres.2006.07.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/archpsyc.60.3.231 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0265021507003250 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325066 · DOI
  19. 10.1176/jnp.14.2.130 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.006 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0165-1781(87)90013-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.012 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0165-1781(02)00269-X · DOI
  24. 10.1080/02699050701765700 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/jrsm.11 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1017/S0033291708003814 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13020190 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12.3.316 · DOI
  30. 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750190059011 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.036 · DOI
  32. 10.6028/jres.087.022 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2020, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  35. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119626 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.041 · DOI

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Yau, K.-C., Revill, G., Blackman, G., Shaikh, M., & Bell, V.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2023-09-29
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
32-40
ISSN
  • 0033-2917
  • 1469-8978
Cited by
13
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pediatric traumatic brain injury as a risk factor for psychosis and psychotic symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291723002878
The paper
Yau, K.-C., Revill, G., Blackman, G., Shaikh, M., & Bell, V. (2024). Pediatric traumatic brain injury as a risk factor for psychosis and psychotic symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291723002878

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.