The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural reward processing among children with conduct disorder and mild traumatic brain injury in the ABCD study
Abstract
Background: Conduct disorder and childhood head injuries frequently co-occur and are linked to a higher risk of later delinquency. While both are known to disrupt reward-related neural circuits, this study investigated whether their combined presence leads to a unique disruption in these pathways, potentially accounting for the increased risk of delinquency. Methods: Using neuroimaging data from the baseline (age 9–10) assessment from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, four groups were compared: children with conduct disorder (CD, n = 588), a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI, n = 1,216), both (mTBI+CD, n = 252), and typically developing controls (TD, n = 705). Neural activation in eight regions of interest (amygdala, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, caudal anterior cingulate cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, thalamus, and insula) during reward anticipation and receipt were assessed during the monetary incentive delay task. Results: After controlling for several covariates, including sex, ADHD, and internalizing problems, the mTBI+CD group displayed greater left amygdala and hippocampal activation during reward receipt compared to all other groups. While they displayed increased activation in the right hippocampus and thalamus compared to TD controls and the right hippocampus compared to the mTBI group, they did not differ from the CD group. No group differences emerged during reward anticipation. Conclusions: Increased left amygdala and hippocampus activation in children with conduct disorder and a history of mild traumatic brain injury may reflect robust encoding of emotionally charged reward experiences, potentially reinforcing memory-guided, reward-seeking behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The comorbid group displayed greater activation in the left amygdala and hippocampus during reward feedback compared to controls, conduct disorder-only, and mTBI-only groups.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as Carr et al. (2025)
In the citing paper
“(4) The findings suggest that co-occurring CD and mTBI may be associated with unique hyperactivation in limbic regions during reward receipt, potentially reflecting enhanced emotional encoding of reward experiences, which may underlie increased reward-seeking behaviors and risk for delinquency.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as Carr et al. (2025)
In the citing paper
“(3) No significant group differences were found in any of the eight regions of interest during reward anticipation.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as Carr et al. (2025)
In the citing paper
“(2) The mTBI and CD group also showed increased activation in the right hippocampus compared to TD controls and the mTBI-only group, and in the right thalamus compared to TD controls.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as Carr et al. (2025)
In the citing paper
“(1) During reward receipt (positive vs. negative feedback), mTBI and CD group displayed significantly greater activation in the left amygdala and left hippocampus compared to all other groups (TD, CD-only, mTBI-only).”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as Carr et al. (2025)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex
Damasio, A. R. (1996) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125 · Cited by 2,847 · cited 1×
“According to the somatic marker hypothesis (Damasio, 1996), it helps associate external stimuli (e.g., reward receipt) with internal emotional and physiological states (or somatic markers) ( Š imi ć et al., 2021).”
The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000446 · Cited by 2,320
Initial Reliability and Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method
Corrigan, J. D., & Bogner, J. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.htr.0000300227.67748.77 · Cited by 816
Rubia, K. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.023 · Cited by 440
Silverman, M. H., Jedd, K., & Luciana, M. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.083 · Cited by 277
Healey, K., Fang, Z., Smith, A., Zemek, R., & Ledoux, A.-A. (2022) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103211 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1038/s41572-019-0095-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hbm.24370 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hbm.24184 · DOI · Paper page
- Swartz, 2020, Reward-related brain activity prospectively predicts increases in alcohol use in adolescents, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 59, 391
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1017/S003329172500087X · DOI
- 10.1542/pir.21.8.265 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/rev0000339 · doi:10.1037/rev0000339
- 10.1016/j.dr.2013.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/00224278221081140 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neures.2010.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/ip.2009.022483 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00701-021-05086-6 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13415-017-0502-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/braincomms/fcae250 · DOI
- 10.1038/npp.2009.129 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119764 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0379 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40865-019-00126-3 · DOI
- Kaufman, 2017, The computerized kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia (KSADS): development and administration guidelines, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56, S357
- 10.1007/s11065-015-9315-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00787-023-02175-y · DOI
- 10.1017/S095457942400141X · DOI
- Muthén, L. K. , & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.013 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2023-062340 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09297049.2020.1769582 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15374424jccp3501_11 · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.2019.6417 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00787-023-02335-0 · doi:10.1007/s00787-023-02335-0
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15081089 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/xge0000434 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11065-018-9385-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116091 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.049 · DOI · Paper page
- Elster, 2025, Altered neural responses to punishment learning in conduct disorder, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 10, 936
- 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.016 · DOI
- 10.3390/biom11060823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101051 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050701426832 · DOI
- Cordova, 2022, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Restricted phenotypes prevalence, comorbidity, and polygenic risk sensitivity in the ABCD baseline cohort, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 61, 1273
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19101092 · DOI
- 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Xu, H., Wu, S., Zhan, H., Xu, G., Zhao, J., & Yin, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1879109
Metadata
- Authors
- Carr, H. R., Eisenbarth, H., Golm, D., Waller, R., & Brandt, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton
- Victoria University of Wellington
- University of Pennsylvania
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 55
- ISSN
- 0033-2917
- 1469-8978
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural reward processing among children with conduct disorder and mild traumatic brain injury in the ABCD study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291725102316
- The paper
- Carr, H. R., Eisenbarth, H., Golm, D., Waller, R., & Brandt, V. (2025). Neural reward processing among children with conduct disorder and mild traumatic brain injury in the ABCD study. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291725102316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.