Cited by 69Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Fifteen years on: evolving ideas in researching sex differences in depression

WILHELM, K., PARKER, G., HADZI-PAVLOVIC, D.·1997·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background A cohort study of a socially homogeneous group of teachers was commenced in 1978 to pursue possible risk factors contributing to the recognized female preponderance of depression. Methods Multiple measures of depressive experience included: (i) lifetime rates, duration and number of depressive episodes using two caseness definitions, DSM-III-R major depression and 'all depression' (which included a category of minor depression); (ii) self-report measures of state and trait depression, neuroticism, and self-esteem. DSM-III-R anxiety disorder rates are also reported and co-morbidity with major depression examined. Results At the 15-year review in 1993, the sample had a mean age of 39 years, there was a trend for a female preponderance in lifetime rates of major depression and 'all depression' (and which was more pronounced with the inclusion of data for anxiety disorders), with statistically significant differences in rates of social and simple phobias and combined anxiety disorders. Mean neuroticism scores were consistently higher for women. Conclusions The strong association between anxiety and depressive disorders suggests that greater reporting of anxiety and higher neuroticism scores in women may be a key determinant that contributes to any female preponderance in depression rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291797005060

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women have greater lifetime prevalence of social and specific phobias, other anxiety disorders, and comorbid depression and anxiety.

    “In addition, women have greater lifetime prevalence of social and specific phobias, other anxiety disorders (Wilhelm, Parker, & Hadzi-Pavlovic, 1997), and comorbid depression and anxiety (Gorman, 2006).”

    From Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal (2008) · cites this paper as Wilhelm, Parker, & Hadzi-Pavlovic, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILHELM, K., PARKER, G., & HADZI-PAVLOVIC, D.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1997-07
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
875-883
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2070435218
Cited by
69
References
2
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
sex differences in depression, major depressive disorder, minor depression, anxiety disorders, neuroticism, self-esteem, phobia, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Self-Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Teaching, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Chi-Square Distribution, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review