The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A high-precision calibration of the AD radiocarbon time scale
Open accessAbstract
A high-precision calibration curve, derived from the radiocarbon age determinations of 195 decade samples spanning the AD 1 to 1950 interval, is presented. Though derived for the Pacific Northwest and California, the curve can be used for a large part of the northern hemisphere. This is proven by the radiocarbon ages of contemporaneous sample pairs which are, in most instances, identical within the quoted precision. Two sets of single-year data reveal no evidence for an 11-year cycle with an amplitude beyond the 12-year measuring precision. This indicates that the calibration curve is also applicable for single-year 14 C samples. Analysis of the Seattle data sets and comparison with those published by the Belfast, La Jolla, and Heidelberg laboratories show that the total variability in a radiocarbon age determination is often larger than that predicted from the quoted errors. Upper limits for the error multiplier (ie, the factor with which the quoted error has to be multiplied to obtain the overall laboratory variability) are estimated at 1.5 for Seattle and Belfast, 1.1 to 1.4 for La Jolla, and 2.0 for Heidelberg. The comparisons with Belfast, La Jolla, and Heidelberg also reveal offsets with the Seattle calibration curve of, respectively, 4, 27 to 55, and 58 years. These offsets are most likely due to laboratory bias. An improvement of the present calibration curve by combining data sets from other laboratories will only be possible when offsets and error multipliers are precisely known through interlaboratory calibration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
Stuiver, M., & Polach, H. A. (1977) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200003672 · Cited by 5,640
Self-citation
Cited by
INTCAL98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Beck, J. W., Burr, G. S., Hughen, K. A., Kromer, B., McCormac, G., Van Der Plicht, J., & Spurk, M. (1998) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200019123 · Cited by 4,421
Self-citationIntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP
Reimer, P. J., Baillie, M. G. L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C. E., Burr, G. S., Edwards, R. L., et al. (2009) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200034202 · Cited by 4,290
Intcal04 Terrestrial Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 0–26 Cal Kyr BP
(2004) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200032999 · Cited by 3,673
Self-citation238U234U230Th232Th systematics and the precise measurement of time over the past 500,000 years
Lawrence Edwards, R., Chen, J. H., & Wasserburg, G. J. (1987) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(87)90154-3 · Cited by 1,303
High-Precision Radiocarbon Age Calibration for Terrestrial and Marine Samples
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P. J., & Braziunas, T. F. (1998) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200019172 · Cited by 1,136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stuiver, M.
- Venue
- Radiocarbon
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-5755
- OpenAlex
- W1505594408
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A high-precision calibration of the AD radiocarbon time scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033822200004859
- The paper
- Stuiver, M. (1982). A high-precision calibration of the AD radiocarbon time scale. Radiocarbon. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200004859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.