The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“How are you?”: Negotiating phatic communion
Abstract
Since its introduction by Malinowski in the 1920s, “phatic communion” has often been appealed to as a concept in sociolinguistics, semantics, stylistics, and communication, typically taken to designate a conventionalized and desemanticized discourse mode or “type.” But a negotiation perspective, following the conversation analysis tradition of research on greetings and troubles telling, fits the discursive realities better. Phaticity is a multidimensional potential for talk in many social settings, where speakers' relational goals supercede their commitment to factuality and instrumentality. We then analyze phatic processes in elderly people's responses to a scripted how are you?opening in interviews about their medical experiences. Discourse analyses of phatic communion can raise important issues for gerontological and medical research. (Phatic communion, small talk, greetings, elderly talk, medical talk, preference structure)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 25,991
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P. (1987) · Cited by 11,894
Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813085 · Cited by 10,438
A Social Psychologist Discovers Chicago Sociology
Schein, E. H., Hughes, E. C., Dalton, M., & Goffman, E. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258197 · Cited by 7,180
(1987) · Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) · Cited by 4,513
(1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665868 · Cited by 4,133
Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication
Bosco, J., Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. (1973) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3585682 · Cited by 2,968
Schiffrin, D. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611841 · Cited by 2,810
Spender, D. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 972
Cited by
Talking Back: "Small" Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation
McCarthy, M. (2003) · Research on Language & Social Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3601_3 · Cited by 393
One click, many meanings: interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media
Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248 · Cited by 346
Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2005) · Text, Speech and Language Technology · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2 · Cited by 324
ROBINSON, J. D. (1998) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00438.x · Cited by 261
Self-citationUser Interaction Patterns and Breakdowns in Conversing with LLM-Powered Voice Assistants
Mahmood, A., Wang, J., Yao, B., Wang, D., & Huang, C.-M. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103406 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Coupland, J., Coupland, N., & Robinson, J. D.
- Venue
- Language in Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-230
- ISSN
- 0047-4045 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8013
- OpenAlex
- W2116882756
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 22.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “How are you?”: Negotiating phatic communion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0047404500015268
- The paper
- Coupland, J., Coupland, N., & Robinson, J. D. (1992). “How are you?”: Negotiating phatic communion. Language in Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500015268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
