Cited by 324Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsAI in Service Interactions

Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents

Bickmore, Timothy, Cassell, Justine·2005·Text, Speech and Language Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Text, Speech and Language Technology
Published
2005
Pages
23-54
ISSN
1386-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1555414560
Cited by
324
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
57.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Text, speech and language technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
social dialogue, embodied conversational agents, task-oriented dialogue, telephone interaction, agent perception, human-agent interaction, behavioural measures, subjective indicators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review