Cited by 129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning

Atkins, Paul W. B., Baddeley, Alan D.·1998·Applied Psycholinguistics

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that individual differences in immediate verbal memory span would predict success in second language vocabulary acquisition. The subjects learned 56 English–Finnish translations during two sessions using a method in which they were encouraged to distribute their learning and to use semantic encoding strategies where appropriate. Verbal, but not visuo-spatial, memory span was correlated with the rate of vocabulary learning, a result that could not have occurred because of immediate retrieval from a short-term buffer. When tested one week later, the subjects were less likely to remember those words they had had difficulty learning, even though they had studied these items more often. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings for vocabulary learning are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0142716400010353

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Atkins P. W. B. (1995). Models of memory and relearning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
  2. 10.1080/14640749208401314 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/h0023229 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/1417415 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90004-J · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90044-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.3758/BF03198098 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/713755604 · DOI
  9. Ellis, 1994, Implicit and explicit learning of languages
  10. 10.3758/BF03210559 · DOI
  11. Landauer, 1978, Practical aspects of memory, 625
  12. Wilson, 1989, The relationship between visual memory function and lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging after closed head injury, Neuropsychology, 3, 255, 10.1037/h0091750 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90040-Q · DOI
  14. 10.1080/14640749508401378 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/h0044616 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S0142716400007062 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90028-9 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02371.x · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90068-X · DOI
  20. Gruneberg, 1992, Memory improvement: Implications for memory theory, 1
  21. 10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.887 · DOI
  22. Bjork, 1975, Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium, 123
  23. 10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80029-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/09602019408401463 · DOI
  25. Baddeley, 1974, The psychology of learning and motivation, 8, 47
  26. 10.1080/14640749208401283 · DOI
  27. Cull, 1996, Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattem-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 365
  28. Brown, 1996, Models of short-term memory, 129
  29. 10.1080/09541449308520112 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Atkins, P. W. B., & Baddeley, A. D.
Venue
Applied Psycholinguistics
Published
1998-10
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
537-552
ISSN
  • 0142-7164
  • 1469-1817
Cited by
129
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review