Cited by 12Language Development and DisordersCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Working memory training improves children’s syntactic ability but not vice versa: A randomized control trial

Open access
Roque-Gutierrez, Ernesto, Ibbotson, Paul·2023·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

We tested several hypotheses about the relation between syntax and working memory (WM). In a pretest/posttest randomized control trial, 104 native Cuban Spanish-speaking children (Mage = 7 years 2 months; 54 girls) took part in syntax training in their first language, syntax training in their second language, WM training, or no training (control). Compared with the control, children in the training conditions showed cognitive transfer from WM to syntax but not from syntax to WM. The result was most striking in the case of their first language, where WM training was as effective as language training in boosting syntactic performance. As well as establishing cognitive transfer at the group level, we also found that individual differences in WM performance, both at baseline and in training, predicted the extent to which children’s syntax improved. The directionality of transfer, the group-level and individual-level results, established in the context of a randomized control design, all point to a strong causal role for domain-general cognition in the processes of language acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105593

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WM training studies have reported directional or asymmetric transfer effects even when tasks are closely matched in similarity.

    “WM training studies have reported directional or asymmetric transfer effects – cases in which training on Task A transfers to Task B, but training on Task B does not comparably transfer back to Task A – even when the two tasks are closely matched in similarity (Liu et al., 2023; Roque-Gutierrez & Ibbotson, 2023).”

    From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Roque-Gutierrez & Ibbotson, 2023

  • n-back training has been reported to transfer to syntactic processing more than syntactic training transfers back to WM outcomes.

    “n-back training has been reported to transfer to syntactic processing more than syntactic training transfers back to WM outcomes (Roque-Gutierrez & Ibbotson, 2023)”

    From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Roque-Gutierrez & Ibbotson, 2023

  • Roque-Gutierrez and Ibbotson (2023) reported an ability-based transfer advantage in the WM-linguistic domain, indicating that transfer asymmetry in higher-order cognitive training requires more study.

    “Roque-Gutierrez and Ibbotson (2023), for example, reported an ability-based transfer advantage in the WM–linguistic domain, indicating that transfer asymmetry in higher-order cognitive training requires more study.”

    From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Roque-Gutierrez and Ibbotson, 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roque-Gutierrez, E., & Ibbotson, P.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ibbotson, Paul
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
227
Pages
105593
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311214243
Cited by
11
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory training, syntactic development, transfer of learning, bilingual children, Spanish-speaking children, first language vs second language, domain-general cognition, language acquisition, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Cognitive Training, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Language, Language Development, Memory, Short-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review