The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage?
Open accessAbstract
Three studies are reported that examine the development of phonological awareness in monolingual and bilingual children between kindergarten and Grade 2. In the first study, monolingual and bilingual children performed equally well on a complex task requiring phoneme substitution. The second study replicated these results and demonstrated a significant role for the language of literacy instruction. The third study extended the research by including two groups of bilingual children and a range of phonological awareness and reading tasks. Spanish–English bilinguals performed better than English-speaking monolinguals on a phoneme segmentation task, but Chinese–English bilinguals performed worse. Other measures of phonological awareness did not differ among the three groups. The results are discussed in terms of a limit on the effect that bilingualism exerts on metalinguistic development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness
Cummins, J. (1978) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/002202217892001 · Cited by 366 · cited 2×
“The results have been mixed, but the majority of published studies have reported an advantage for bilingual children (Ben–Zeev, 1977; Bialystok, 1986, 1988; Bowey, 1988; Cummins, 1978; Edwards & Christophersen, 1988; Galambos & Goldin–Meadow, 1990; Galambos & Hakuta, 1988; Smith & Tager–Flusberg, 1982; Yelland et al.,…”
BackgroundResultThe effects of learning two languages on levels of metalinguistic awareness
Galambos, S. J., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1990) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90030-n · Cited by 276
Subject-specific and task-specific characteristics of metalinguistic awareness in bilingual children
Galambos, S. J., & Hakuta, K. (1988) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400006780 · Cited by 149
Cited by
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism
Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654310368803 · Cited by 1,132
Hoff, E. (2013) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027238 · Cited by 976
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01707.x · Cited by 448
Self-citationProctor, C. P., August, D., Carlo, M. S., & Snow, C. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.159 · Cited by 365
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0033890 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- BIALYSTOK, E., MAJUMDER, S., & MARTIN, M. M.
- Venue
- Applied Psycholinguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-21
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-44
- ISSN
- 0142-7164 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1817
- OpenAlex
- W2048389585
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s014271640300002x
- The paper
- BIALYSTOK, E., MAJUMDER, S., & MARTIN, M. M. (2003). Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? Applied Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s014271640300002x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
