Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders

COLÉ, PASCALE, BOUTON, SOPHIE, LEUWERS, CHRISTEL, CASALIS, SEVERINE, SPRENGER-CHAROLLES, LILIANE·2012·Applied Psycholinguistics

Abstract

Morphological processing by French children was investigated in two experiments. The first showed that second and third graders read pseudowords such as chat-ure (cat-ish) composed of an illegally combined real stem and real derivational suffix faster and more accurately than they read matched pseudowords composed of a pseudostem and a real derivational suffix (e.g., chot-ure) or a pseudostem and a pseudosuffix (e.g., chot-ore). More, the chot-ure items were read faster and more accurately than the chot-ore items. These results suggest that beginning French readers are able to use morphological units (both stems and derivational suffixes) to decode new words. The second experiment compared the impact of display format on reading time. Suffixed words were presented in four segmentation formats: syllabic (ma lade), morphological (mal ade), morphological + 1 grapheme (mala de), or unsegmented (malade). For both groups of readers, the morphological + 1 condition generated the longest reading times but there was no difference between the other three conditions. It was concluded that syllables, morphemes, and whole word forms contribute to a similar extent to word reading for low-frequency words. Morphological processing may therefore be used early by French children to identify both new words and low-frequency words.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0142716411000282

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02500-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1006/brln.2001.2548 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 · DOI
  4. Bertram, 2000, The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my morpheme friends., Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 2
  5. 10.1017/S0142716499004038 · DOI
  6. Taft, 1991, Reading and the mental lexicon
  7. Seymour, 1997, Les orthographes et leur acquisition, 385
  8. 10.1017/S0305000907008525 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1348/026151008X389575 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s11145-005-1912-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2523 · DOI
  13. 10.3406/psy.2005.3818 · DOI
  14. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_2 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00539-9 · DOI
  16. Lecoq, 1996, L’É.Co.S.Se: Une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique
  17. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Beard, 2007, The handbook of morphology, 44
  19. 10.3406/psy.2004.29686 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0010-0285(84)90012-4 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665 · DOI
  22. Mann, 2003, Reading complex words: Cross-language studies, 1
  23. 10.1017/S0142716400009541 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Carlisle, 2003, Reading complex words: Cross-language studies
  26. 10.1023/A:1008131926604 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1007/s10936-006-9035-6 · DOI
  29. Dunn, 1993, Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Adaptation française du Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised
  30. Jaffré, 1997, Orthographes: Des systèmes aux usages
  31. 10.1023/A:1008177205648 · DOI
  32. Ehri, 1998, Word recognition in beginning literacy, 3
  33. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_3 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90025-9 · DOI
  35. 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3 · DOI
  36. 10.1017/S0142716404001110 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1080/02702710390227369 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/BF02648177 · DOI
  39. 10.3758/BF03196309 · DOI
  40. Fowler, 1995, Morphological aspects of language processing, 157
  41. Frith, 1985, Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading, 301
  42. 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90042-I · DOI
  43. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1080/01690960400013213 · DOI
  45. Laudanna, 1995, Morphological aspects of language processing, 345
  46. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02450.x · DOI
  47. 10.1017/S0142716409090213 · DOI
  48. Lefavrais, 1967, Test de l'Alouette: Manuel
  49. Raven, 1998, Les Progressive Matrices Couleurs (CPM ou PM47)
  50. 10.3758/BF03195560 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90215-3 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/01690960244000036 · DOI
  53. 10.1023/A:1008136012492 · DOI
  54. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.743 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.2307/747823 · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x · DOI
  57. Stump, 2007, The handbook of morphology, 13
  58. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.122 · DOI
  59. 10.1023/A:1008196330239 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90026-1 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Sprenger-Charolles, 2006, Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia
  62. 10.1177/00238309010440030301 · DOI
  63. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_4 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Carlisle, 1995, Morphological aspects of language processing, 189
  66. 10.2307/1166112 · DOI
  67. 10.1007/BF02648022 · DOI
  68. 10.1017/S014271640505023X · DOI
  69. 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
COLÉ, P., BOUTON, S., LEUWERS, C., CASALIS, S., & SPRENGER-CHAROLLES, L.
Venue
Applied Psycholinguistics
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
97-120
ISSN
  • 0142-7164
  • 1469-1817
Cited by
43
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review