The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders
Abstract
Morphological processing by French children was investigated in two experiments. The first showed that second and third graders read pseudowords such as chat-ure (cat-ish) composed of an illegally combined real stem and real derivational suffix faster and more accurately than they read matched pseudowords composed of a pseudostem and a real derivational suffix (e.g., chot-ure) or a pseudostem and a pseudosuffix (e.g., chot-ore). More, the chot-ure items were read faster and more accurately than the chot-ore items. These results suggest that beginning French readers are able to use morphological units (both stems and derivational suffixes) to decode new words. The second experiment compared the impact of display format on reading time. Suffixed words were presented in four segmentation formats: syllabic (ma lade), morphological (mal ade), morphological + 1 grapheme (mala de), or unsegmented (malade). For both groups of readers, the morphological + 1 condition generated the longest reading times but there was no difference between the other three conditions. It was concluded that syllables, morphemes, and whole word forms contribute to a similar extent to word reading for low-frequency words. Morphological processing may therefore be used early by French children to identify both new words and low-frequency words.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and (4) an increased sensitivity to morphological structure (e.g., Colé et al., 2011).”
From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Colé et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & collaboration with COST Action A8 network (2003) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712603321661859 · Cited by 2,601
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(03)00024-9 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02500-9 · DOI
- 10.1006/brln.2001.2548 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 · DOI
- Bertram, 2000, The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my morpheme friends., Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 2
- 10.1017/S0142716499004038 · DOI
- Taft, 1991, Reading and the mental lexicon
- Seymour, 1997, Les orthographes et leur acquisition, 385
- 10.1017/S0305000907008525 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2 · DOI
- 10.1348/026151008X389575 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11145-005-1912-0 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmla.1997.2523 · DOI
- 10.3406/psy.2005.3818 · DOI
- 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00539-9 · DOI
- Lecoq, 1996, L’É.Co.S.Se: Une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique
- 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134 · DOI · Paper page
- Beard, 2007, The handbook of morphology, 44
- 10.3406/psy.2004.29686 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0285(84)90012-4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665 · DOI
- Mann, 2003, Reading complex words: Cross-language studies, 1
- 10.1017/S0142716400009541 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- Carlisle, 2003, Reading complex words: Cross-language studies
- 10.1023/A:1008131926604 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10936-006-9035-6 · DOI
- Dunn, 1993, Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Adaptation française du Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised
- Jaffré, 1997, Orthographes: Des systèmes aux usages
- 10.1023/A:1008177205648 · DOI
- Ehri, 1998, Word recognition in beginning literacy, 3
- 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90025-9 · DOI
- 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716404001110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02702710390227369 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02648177 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03196309 · DOI
- Fowler, 1995, Morphological aspects of language processing, 157
- Frith, 1985, Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading, 301
- 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90042-I · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01690960400013213 · DOI
- Laudanna, 1995, Morphological aspects of language processing, 345
- 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02450.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716409090213 · DOI
- Lefavrais, 1967, Test de l'Alouette: Manuel
- Raven, 1998, Les Progressive Matrices Couleurs (CPM ou PM47)
- 10.3758/BF03195560 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90215-3 · DOI
- 10.1080/01690960244000036 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008136012492 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.743 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/747823 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x · DOI
- Stump, 2007, The handbook of morphology, 13
- 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.122 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008196330239 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90026-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Sprenger-Charolles, 2006, Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia
- 10.1177/00238309010440030301 · DOI
- 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Carlisle, 1995, Morphological aspects of language processing, 189
- 10.2307/1166112 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02648022 · DOI
- 10.1017/S014271640505023X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- COLÉ, P., BOUTON, S., LEUWERS, C., CASALIS, S., & SPRENGER-CHAROLLES, L.
- Venue
- Applied Psycholinguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-120
- ISSN
- 0142-7164
- 1469-1817
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review