Cited by 927Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models.

Harm, Michael W., Seidenberg, Mark S.·1999·Psychological Review

Abstract

The development of reading skill and bases of developmental dyslexia were explored using connectionist models. Four issues were examined: the acquisition of phonological knowledge prior to reading, how this knowledge facilitates learning to read, phonological and nonphonological bases of dyslexia, and effects of literacy on phonological representation. Compared with simple feedforward networks, representing phonological knowledge in an attractor network yielded improved learning and generalization. Phonological and surface forms of developmental dyslexia, which are usually attributed to impairments in distinct lexical and nonlexical processing "routes," were derived from different types of damage to the network. The results provide a computationally explicit account of many aspects of reading acquisition using connectionist principles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.491

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of consistency or ambiguity of spelling-sound correspondence within language have been successfully simulated in connectionist and exemplar-based computational models.

    “these effects of consistencyor ambiguityof spelling-sound correspondence within language have been successfullysimulated in connectionist (Harm & Seidenberg, 1999; Plaut, McClelland, Seidenberg, & Patterson, 1996; Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989; Zorzi, Houghton, & Butterworth, 1998) and exemplar-based (Ellis & Hicks, 2000) computational models.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1999
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
491-528
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2158572527
Cited by
927
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 51
FWCI
58.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (29891)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH 01188, K02MH001188, NIMH 47566, P01MH047566)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, phonological knowledge, connectionist models, attractor networks, phonological representation, lexical processing, surface dyslexia, phonological dyslexia, generalization
MeSH terms
Child, Dyslexia, Humans, Phonation, Psychological Theory, Reading, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review