CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198Gender Studies in LanguageEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 238 of the 244 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education

Sunderland, Jane·2000·Language Teaching
DOI 10.1017/s0261444800015688
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0261444800015688

Cites

238 of 238 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 244 references

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. Vandrick, 1999, The case for more research on female students in the ESL/EFL classroom, TESOL Matters, 9, 16
  2. Talansky, 1986, Sex role stereotyping in TEFL teaching materials, Perspectives, XI, 32
  3. Sunderland, Gender, language learning and classroom pedagogy
  4. Sunderland J. (1996). Gendered discourse in the foreign language classroom: teacher-student and stndent-teaclier talk, and the social construction of children's masculinities and femininities. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
  5. Sunderland, 1995, Language and gender: interdisciplinary perspectives
  6. Spaulding, 1966, Achievement, creativity and self-concept: correlates of teacher-pupil interactions in elementary school
  7. Siegal, 1994, Cultural performances: proceedings of the third Women and Language Conference
  8. Stephens, 1990, The world of John and Mary Smith: a study of Quirk and Greenbaum's, University Grammar of English, 1, 91
  9. Schmitz, 1975, The cultural revolution in foreign language teaching
  10. Romaine, 1999, Communicating gender, 293
  11. Pugsley, 1992, Sexist language and stereotyping in ELT materials, worrking Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism, 2, 5
  12. Provo, 1991, Sex differences in nonnative speaker interaction, The Language Teacher, XV, 25
  13. Pavlenko, 2000, Proceedings from the fifth Berkeley Women and Language Conference
  14. Pauwels, 2000, Does language reform lead to linguistic change?, Australian Language Matters, 8, 3
  15. Osugi, 1990, Sex bias in Japan-published monolingual English dictionaries, JALT Journal, 12
  16. O'Neill R. (1994). ‘The case of Julia Frost’ or ‘The lure of the stereotype’. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  17. Norton, Oxford University handbook of applied linguistics
  18. Pugsley, 1991, Language and gender in the EFL classroom, The Teacher Trainer, 5, 27
  19. Ogbay S. (1999). Gendered perceptions, silences and resistance in two Eritrean secondary schools: reasons for girls' lower performance than boys. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
  20. Sunderland J. & Litosseliti E. (eds.) (forthcoming). Discourse analysis and gender identity.
  21. Clark, 1998, Gender on the agenda:factors motivating boys and girls in MFLs
  22. Elliot, 1978, Sex role constraints on freedom of discussion: a neglected reality of the classroom, The New Era, 55, 147
  23. Swann, 1995, Language and gender
  24. Stanworth, 1983, Gender and schooling
  25. Fujimura-Fanselow, 1991, Women's studies in language education, The Language Teacher, XV, 3
  26. Hennessy, 1994, Exploring gender questions and implications for English language education
  27. Cameron, 1990, The Feminist Critique of Language
  28. Morrish E. (forthcoming) The case of the indefinite pronoun: discourse and the concealment of lesbian identity in class. In J. Sunderland & E, Litosseliti (eds.). Discourse analysis and gender identity.
  29. Mills, 1995, Feminist stylistics
  30. Coates, 1993, Women, men and language: a sociolingustic account of gender differences in language
  31. Talbot, 1997, Language and gender: an introduction
  32. Howe, 1997, Gender and classroom interaction: a research review
  33. Mills, 1995, Language and gender: interdisciplinary perspectiivs
  34. Yamashiro, 1996, Gender issues in language education
  35. Clarricoates, 1983, Sexism in the secondary curriculum
  36. Vandrick, 1999, Who's afraid of critical feminist pedagogies?, TESOL Matters, 9, 9
  37. Porter, 1991, Language testing in the nineties, 320
  38. Jones, 1996, Motivation and gender: a Welsh case study, Journal of Celtic Language Learning, 2, 6
  39. Bramlett, 1997, The concept of the self and the lexicon: language in and about gay communities, Working Papers in Discourse Studies: Language, Cender, and Culture, 1, 1
  40. Vandrick, 1995, Teaching and practising feminism in the University ESL class, TESOL Journal, 4
  41. Altani, 1995, Language and gender: interdisciplinary perspectives
  42. Webb, 1985, Gender influences in classroom interaction
  43. Myers, 1992, Gendervatch
  44. Freudenstein, 1978, The role ofuvmen in foreign language textbooks: a collection of essays
  45. Gubb, 1980, Language and roles in mixed and single sex groups, Language for Learning, 2, 3
  46. Beebe, 1998, Sexist language and English as a foreign language: a problem of knowledge and choice, The Language Teacher, 22, 7
  47. Ferguson B. (1993). Gender bias in English language oral testing: an examination of the effect of gender and perceived expertness on English language teachers' evaluation and listening recall. MA dissertation. University of Kent, UK.
  48. Morse, 1985, Gender influences in classroom interaction
  49. Holmes, 1989, Is sex relevant in the ESL classroom?, Language Issues, 3, 14
  50. Yepez, 1994, A case for studying sexism in the ESL classroom, Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism, 4, 5
  51. Cohen, 1998, Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement
  52. Batters, 1986, Do boys really think languages are just girl-talk?, Modern Languages, 67, 75
  53. Florent J. , Fuller K. , Pugsley J. , Walter C. & Young A. (1994). On balance: guidelines for the representation of women and men in English language teaching materials. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  54. Beebe, 1996, Gender issues in language education
  55. Burns, 1994, Exploring gender: questions and implications for English language education
  56. Rees-Parnell, 1976, Women in the world of Kernel Lessons Intermediate, ARELS Journal, 2
  57. Arnot, 1996, Educational Reforms and Gender Equality in Schools. Equal Opportunities Commission Research Discussion Series
  58. Jiménez Catalán R. (forthcoming) Sex/gender: the forgotten factor in SLA textbooks. Proceedings of AEDEAN [Spanish Association of English Philology Studies] Conference, 2000.
  59. Carroll D. & Kowitz J. (1994). Using concordancing techniques to study gender stereotyping in ELT textbooks. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  60. Beswick, 1976, Mixed or single-sex for French?, Audio-Visual Language Journal, 34
  61. Sunderland J. (1994b). Differential treatment by gender by the teacher in the EFL/ESL classroom. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  62. Cheng, 1995, Sdente and mathematics in full-time education after 16
  63. Alcón, 1994, The role of participation and gender in non-native speakers' classroom interaction, Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism, 4, 51
  64. Bucholtz, 1994, Cultural performances: proceedings of the third Berkeley Wanten and Language Conference
  65. Coates, 1996, Women talk
  66. Cameron D. (1994). Problems of sexist and non-sexist language. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  67. Bruce, 1986, Sex stereotyping in English language course-books-is it still an issue?, TESOL France News, 6, 46
  68. Gass, 1986, Talking to learn: conversation in second language acquisition
  69. Cochran, 1992, Towards degendered English in the ESL classroom, Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism, 2, 27
  70. Sunderland, 1990, English Studies, 4, 8
  71. Du Vivier M. , Freeuairn I. & Garton-Sprenger J. (1994). Why ‘Women in TEFL’? In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  72. Holmes J. (1994). Improving the lot of female language learners. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  73. Byrnes F. (1994). Including gender in EFL/ESL teacher education programmes. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  74. Cohen, 1996, Fashioning masculinity, national identity and language in the eighteenth century
  75. Holmes, 1989, Beyond words
  76. Cameron, 1998, The feminist aitique of language
  77. Gibbon, 1999, Feminist perspectifs on language
  78. Gisnet, 1988, Sexism in English by Television textbooks, English Teachers' Journal, 36, 60
  79. Gilbert, 1992, Achieving equity in small-group discussions, Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism, 2, 55
  80. Goldstein T. (1995).‘Nobody is talking bad’: creating community and claiming power on the production lines. In K. Hall and M. Bucholtz (eds.). Gender articulated: language and the socially constructed self. New York: Routledge.
  81. Wilkinson, 1995, Feminism and discourse
  82. Mac An Ghaill, 1994, Thc making of men: masculinitites, sexuality and schooling
  83. Hall, 1995, Gender articulated: language and the socially constructed self
  84. Warner, 1996, Gender and belief systems: proceedings of the fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference
  85. Holmes, 1995, Women, men and politeness
  86. Harman, 1978, Sex discrimination in school: how to fight it
  87. Oxford R. (1994). La difference continue.…: gender differences in second/foreign language learning styles and strategies. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  88. Hingley, 1983, Sexism in the secondary curriculum
  89. Cameron, 2000, Good to talk?
  90. Grant, 1985, Gender influences in classroom interaction
  91. Holmes, 1987, Communication and learning in the classroom community, 5
  92. Wertheim, 1998, Engendering communication, proceedings from the fifth Berkeley Women and Language Conference
  93. Johnson, 1997, Language and masculinity
  94. Jaeger, 1998, Engendering communication: proceedings from the fifth Berkeley Women and Language Conference
  95. Sadker, 1985, Sexism in the schoolroom of the '80s, Psychology Today, 54
  96. Jiménez Catalan, Estudios de la Mujer en ámbito de los países de habla inglesa
  97. Johnson, 1997, Language and masculinity
  98. Kitetu C. (1998). An examination of physics classroom discourse practices and their construction of gendered identities in a Kenyan secondary school. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
  99. Chouliaraki L. (1994). Taskway: a case study. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  100. 2000, Languages: the next generation
  101. Swann J. (forthcoming). Yes, but is it gender? In J. Sunderland & E. Litosseliti (eds.). Discourse analysis and gender identity.
  102. Sunderland, 1995, Gender and language testing, Language Testing Update, 17, 24
  103. Mannheim C. (1994). Learners' attitudes to EFL textbook sexism. In J. Sunderland (ed.) (1994a).
  104. Spender, 1980, Learning to lose

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sunderland, J.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Sunderland, Jane
ORCID
Sunderland, Jane
Venue
Language Teaching
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2000-10
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
203-223
ISSN
  • 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3049
DOI
10.1017/s0261444800015688
OpenAlex
W2172028161
Cited by
198
References
244
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 3176 d)
Locations
Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
gender and language, second language teaching, foreign language teaching, gender in language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review