The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eating disorders in a general practice population. Prevalence, characteristics and follow-up at 12 to 18 months
Abstract
Attenders to four South London group general practices were screened using the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), after which all high scorers and a random selection of low scorers were approached for interview. General practitioners (GPs) were given details on a random half of high-scoring patients with the aim of assessing intervention for revealed and hidden psychopathology. Twelve to 18 months later all high scorers on the EAT were followed up by post to measure change in behaviour and attitudes. Practice records were examined to determine the doctor's knowledge of the patient and any intervention that had occurred. It was found that 1.1% of women had bulimia nervosa and 2.8% a partial-syndrome eating disorder. No cases of anorexia nervosa were found. Cases of bulimia nervosa and partial syndromes were similar in being: mainly female, of higher social class, in the normal weight range but with considerable weight fluctuation in the past, more likely to have had a history of menstrual irregularity, and frequently psychologically troubled with more past psychiatric contact. Over the follow-up period there was some change along a spectrum of normal dieting to the full syndrome, although only one subject with bulimia nervosa recovered significantly. Although the GPs were unaware of the eating pathology and their intervention was minimal, most had documented their patients' psychological distress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Biology of Human Starvation: Volume I
KEYS, A., BROŽEK, J., HENSCHEL, A., MICKELSEN, O., & TAYLOR, H. L. (1950) · doi:10.5749/j.ctv9b2tqv · Cited by 2,039
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,539
Alcohol dependence: Provisional description of a clinical syndrome
Edwards, G., & Gross, M. M. (1976) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6017.1058 · Cited by 1,163
Cited by
The SCOFF questionnaire: Assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders
Morgan, J. F., Reid, F., & Lacey, J. H. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467 · Cited by 1,416
Mond, J. M., Hay, P. J., Rodgers, B., Owen, C., & Beumont, P. J. V. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00161-x · Cited by 1,121
The genetic epidemiology of bulimia nervosa.
(1991) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.148.12.1627 · Cited by 631
Studies of the epidemiology of bulimia nervosa
(1990) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.147.4.401 · Cited by 631
Longitudinal relationships between childhood, adolescent, and adult eating disorders
KOTLER, L. A., COHEN, P., DAVIES, M., PINE, D. S., & WALSH, B. T. (2001) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200112000-00014 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- King, M. B.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine. Monograph Supplement
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0264-1801 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-2023
- OpenAlex
- W2158960781
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eating disorders in a general practice population. Prevalence, characteristics and follow-up at 12 to 18 months. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0264180100000515
- The paper
- King, M. B. (1989). Eating disorders in a general practice population. Prevalence, characteristics and follow-up at 12 to 18 months. Psychological Medicine. Monograph Supplement. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0264180100000515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.