Cited by 423Second Language Acquisition and LearningSubtitles and Audiovisual MediaEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION THROUGH VIEWING L2 TELEVISION AND FACTORS THAT AFFECT LEARNING

Open access
Peters, Elke, Webb, Stuart·2018·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

Research has begun to demonstrate that L2 words can be learned incidentally through watching audio-visual materials. Although there are a large number of studies that have investigated incidental vocabulary learning through reading a single text, there are no studies that have explored incidental vocabulary learning through viewing a single full-length TV program. The present study fills this gap. Additionally, three word-related variables (frequency of occurrence, cognateness, word relevance) and one learner-related variable (prior vocabulary knowledge) that might contribute to incidental vocabulary learning were examined. Two experiments were conducted with Dutch-speaking EFL learners to measure the effects of viewing TV on form recognition and meaning recall (Experiment 1) and meaning recognition (Experiment 2). The findings showed that viewing TV resulted in incidental vocabulary learning at the level of meaning recall and meaning recognition. The research also revealed that learning was affected by frequency of occurrence, prior vocabulary knowledge, and cognateness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263117000407

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Captioned videos have helped learners at various skill levels to visualize what they have heard, thereby enhancing vocabulary acquisition.

    “Captioned videos have helped learners at various skill levels to visualize what they have heard, thereby enhancing vocabulary acquisition (Peters & Webb, 2018; Teng, 2019a, 2019b, 2019c).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, E., & Webb, S.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Peters, Elke
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
2018-01-30
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
551-577
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
OpenAlex
W2790358757
Cited by
423
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 3
FWCI
67.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
incidental vocabulary learning, second language vocabulary, television viewing, audiovisual input, word frequency, shape recognition, meaning recall, meaning recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review