Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Should We Listen or Read? Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Knowledge

KIM, KATHY MINHYE, GODFROID, ALINE·2019·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

We examined the role of modality in learning second language (L2) grammar and forming implicit (unconscious) and explicit (conscious) knowledge. To this end, we isolated the effects of the physical medium of input (i.e., aural or visual) from those of the presentation method (i.e., word‐by‐word or simultaneous). We also explored the role of test modality in L2 performance, by including L2 knowledge tests in both aural and visual modes. Native English speakers engaged in meaning‐focused integrated practice of 3 German syntactic rules. In Experiment 1, learners were given aural or visual word‐by‐word (rapid serial visual presentation; RSVP) input and in Experiment 2, they were given aural or natural written input. We found evidence of learning across all 4 groups, but different types of resultant knowledge. In particular, learners gained explicit knowledge in all input modalities, yet only those trained with natural written input also developed robust implicit knowledge. We conclude that the permanence of visual input may be a critical advantage for beginning learners to develop implicit knowledge of word order rules. Support in the form of written materials can ease the cognitive burden on beginning learners, with better outcomes as a result.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/modl.12583

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01053.x · DOI
  2. 10.1093/applin/3.3.181 · DOI
  3. 10.3758/s13414-013-0475-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/modl.12460 · DOI
  5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/09541440802097951 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0278-7393.12.2.268 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00426-004-0208-3 · DOI
  10. 10.21832/9781847691767-003 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90046-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/cogs.12257 · DOI
  13. Field A., 2012, Discovering statistics using R
  14. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0267190515000112 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S0272263115000388 · DOI
  17. 10.4324/9781315775616 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/lang.12136 · DOI
  19. 10.1006/cogp.1997.0654 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/S0272263110000045 · DOI
  21. 10.3138/cmlr.66.3.371 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00708.x · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.208 · DOI
  24. 10.1075/sibil.48.16kac · DOI
  25. 10.1075/tblt.7.08kor · DOI
  26. Kuiken F., 2012, The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition, 364
  27. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.004 · DOI
  28. 10.1017/S0272263110000525 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00637.x · DOI
  30. 10.1017/S0272263114000333 · DOI
  31. 10.1075/lllt.45.10gar · DOI
  32. Miller Z. F., 2020, Emotions in incidental language learning: An individual differences approach, Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  33. 10.1111/lang.12292 · DOI
  34. 10.1191/026765897671676818 · DOI
  35. 10.3758/BF03202613 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.039 · DOI
  38. 10.1017/S0305000902005111 · DOI
  39. Rebuschat P., 2008, Implicit learning of natural language syntax
  40. 10.1111/lang.12010 · DOI
  41. 10.1017/S0272263115000145 · DOI
  42. 10.1017/S0142716411000580 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.009 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.047 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1017/S0142716415000247 · DOI
  47. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2839 · DOI
  48. Sherrick C. E., 1986, Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. I: Sensory processes and perception, 1
  49. 10.1017/S0272263116000036 · DOI
  50. 10.1075/tblt.7.09tav · DOI
  51. 10.1017/S0272263115000455 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/lang.12228 · DOI
  53. 10.1075/sibil.48.09wal · DOI
  54. 10.1017/S0272263105050138 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007 · DOI
  56. 10.1017/S0272263101003023 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
KIM, K. M., & GODFROID, A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University Second Language Studies Program B220 Wells Hall, 619 Red Cedar Road East Lansing MI 48824
  • Michigan State University Second Language Studies Program B253 Wells Hall, 619 Red Cedar Road East Lansing MI 48824
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-02
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
648-664
ISSN
  • 0026-7902
  • 1540-4781
Cited by
34
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • Keimyung University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Should We Listen or Read? Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/modl.12583
The paper
KIM, K. M., & GODFROID, A. (2019). Should We Listen or Read? Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12583