Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implicit Statistical Learning: A Tale of Two Literatures

Christiansen, Morten H.·2019·Topics in Cognitive Science

Abstract

Implicit learning and statistical learning are two contemporary approaches to the long‐standing question in psychology and cognitive science of how organisms pick up on patterned regularities in their environment. Although both approaches focus on the learner's ability to use distributional properties to discover patterns in the input, the relevant research has largely been published in separate literatures and with surprisingly little cross‐pollination between them. This has resulted in apparently opposing perspectives on the computations involved in learning, pitting chunk‐based learning against probabilistic learning. In this paper, I trace the nearly century‐long historical pedigree of the two approaches to learning and argue for their integration under the heading of “implicit statistical learning.” Building on basic insights from the memory literature, I sketch a framework for statistically based chunking that aims to provide a unified basis for understanding implicit statistical learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tops.12332

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0047 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/tops.12271 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.004 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/02724980143000307 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/14640748408402156 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/h0023763 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/tops.12274 · DOI
  8. 10.7551/mitpress/10406.001.0001 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X · DOI
  10. 10.3758/BF03201243 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x · DOI
  14. 10.1080/09541440802097951 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168532 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/0278-7393.6.3.319 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/17470218.2010.538972 · DOI
  19. Esper E. A., 1925, A technique for the experimental investigation of associative interference in artificial linguistic material
  20. 10.1080/00221309.1933.9713192 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/411408 · DOI
  22. Fischer S., 1922, Über das Entstehen und Verstehen von Namen, mit einem Beitrage zur Lehre von den transkortikalen Aphasien, Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie, 43, 32
  23. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000295 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010 · DOI
  25. Frost R. L. A., 2016, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 81
  26. 10.1177/0956797612472207 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459 · DOI
  29. Isbilen E. S., 2017, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 564
  30. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.009 · DOI
  31. 10.3758/BF03196873 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0707835105 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00004-5 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.79 · DOI
  35. Levelt W., 2013, A history of psycholinguistics: The pre‐Chomskyan era
  36. McCauley S. M., 2011, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1619
  37. 10.1075/ml.9.3.03mcc · DOI
  38. McCauley S. M., 2015, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
  39. McCauley S. M., 2017, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2681
  40. 10.1037/h0031564 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/h0044933 · DOI
  42. Miller G. A., 1967, The psychology of communication: Seven essays, 125
  43. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01072.x · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90017-X · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.011 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00149-2 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006 · DOI
  49. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2576 · DOI
  50. 10.1080/016909697386682 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.3758/BF03196682 · DOI
  54. 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0059 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001 · DOI
  57. Slone L., 2015, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2218
  58. Studdert‐Kennedy M., 1986, Behavioral and social science: Fifty years of discovery, 208
  59. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.006 · DOI
  60. 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/lang.12137 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Christiansen, M. H.
Affiliations
Department of Psychology Cornell University
Venue
Topics in Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-06
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
468-481
ISSN
  • 1756-8757
  • 1756-8765
Cited by
167
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review