Cited by 9Retinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms

Loss of melanoregulin (MREG) enhances cathepsin-D secretion by the retinal pigment epithelium

Open access
FROST, LAURA S., LOPES, VANDA S., STEFANO, FRANK P., BRAGIN, ALVINA, WILLIAMS, DAVID S., MITCHELL, CLAIRE H., BOESZE-BATTAGLIA, KATHLEEN·2013·Visual Neuroscience

Abstract

Cathepsin-D (Cat-D) is a major proteolytic enzyme in phagocytic cells. In the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), it is responsible for the daily degradation of photoreceptor outer segments (POSs) to maintain retinal homeostasis. Melanoregulin (MREG)-mediated loss of phagocytic capacity has been linked to diminished intracellular Cat-D activity. Here, we demonstrate that loss of MREG enhances the secretion of intermediate Cat-D (48 kDa), resulting in a net enhancement of extracellular Cat-D activity. These results suggest that MREG is required to maintain Cat-D homeostasis in the RPE and likely plays a protective role in retinal health. In this regard, in the Mreg dsu/dsu mouse, we observe increased basal laminin. Loss of the Mreg dsu allele is not lethal and therefore leads to slow age-dependent changes in the RPE. Thus, we propose that this model will allow us to study potential dysregulatory functions of Cat-D in retinal disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0952523813000096

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RPE from Mreg−/− mice have increased secretion of pro-cathepsin D into the extracellular medium.

    “RPE from Mreg−/− mice have decreased levels of the mature enzyme (Damek-Poprawa et al., 2009), and increased secretion of pro-cathepsin D into the extracellular medium (Frost et al., 2013).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2013

  • Melanoregulin (MREG) is a small, highly charged protein that localizes to lysosomes.

    “Similarly, melanoregulin (MREG), a small, highly-charged protein that localizes to lysosomes (Frost et al., 2013), is important for cathepsin D maturation.”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2013

  • MREG is important for cathepsin D maturation.

    “Similarly, melanoregulin (MREG), a small, highly-charged protein that localizes to lysosomes (Frost et al., 2013), is important for cathepsin D maturation.”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2013

  • Loss of MREG, an LC3B binding partner, contributes to a delay in phagosome maturation and lysosomal exocytosis, as well as basal laminar thickening in older mice.

    “Loss of MREG, an LC3B binding partner contributes to a delay in phagosome maturation (Damek-Poprawa et al., 2009) and lysosomal exocytosis, as well as basal laminar thickening in older mice (Frost et al., 2013).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FROST, L. S., LOPES, V. S., STEFANO, F. P., BRAGIN, A., WILLIAMS, D. S., MITCHELL, C. H., & BOESZE-BATTAGLIA, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Visual Neuroscience
Published
2013-04-23
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
55-64
ISSN
  • 0952-5238 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8714
OpenAlex
W2150129806
Cited by
9
References
61
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Visual Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (EY001583, R01EY013434, R01EY010420, R01 EY07042, R21EY018705, R01EY007042, P30EY001583)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR026365)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Keywords
cathepsin D, retinal pigment epithelium, phagocytosis, laminin, retinal homeostasis, retinal disease
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Carrier Proteins, Cathepsin D, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Gene Expression Regulation, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Retina, Transduction, Genetic, Microscopy, Immunoelectron, Microscopy, Confocal, Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transport, RNA, Small Interfering, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Retinal Pigment Epithelium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review