Cited by 63Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCellular transport and secretionRetinal Diseases and Treatments

The contribution of melanoregulin to microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) associated phagocytosis in retinal pigment epithelium

Open access
Frost, Laura S., Lopes, Vanda S., Bragin, Alvina, Reyes-Reveles, Juan, Brancato, Jennifer, Cohen, Art, Mitchell, Claire H., Williams, David S. +1 more·2015·Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

A main requisite in the phagocytosis of ingested material is a coordinated series of maturation steps which lead to the degradation of ingested cargo. Photoreceptor outer segment (POS) renewal involves phagocytosis of the distal disk membranes by the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Previously, we identified melanoregulin (MREG) as an intracellular cargo-sorting protein required for the degradation of POS disks. Here, we provide evidence that MREG-dependent processing links both autophagic and phagocytic processes in LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP). Ingested POS phagosomes are associated with endogenous LC3 and MREG. The LC3 association with POSs exhibited properties of LAP; it was independent of rapamycin pretreatment, but dependent on Atg5. Loss of MREG resulted in a decrease in the extent of LC3-POS association. Studies using DQ-BSA suggest that loss of MREG does not compromise the association and fusion of LC3-positive phagosomes with lysosomes. Furthermore, the mechanism of MREG action is likely through a protein complex that includes LC3, as determined by colocalization and immunoprecipitation in both RPE cells and macrophages. We posit that MREG participates in coordinating the association of phagosomes with LC3 for content degradation with the loss of MREG leading to phagosome accumulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12035-014-8920-5

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following ingestion of OS membrane by the RPE, LC3B-II, its conjugation factor ATG5, and the LC3 adaptor MREG are all found on a subpopulation of OS phagosomes within 15 min of ingestion.

    “Following the ingestion of OS membrane by the RPE, LC3B-II, its conjugation factor, ATG5, as well as the LC3 adaptor melanoregulin (MREG), are all found on a subpopulation of OS phagosomes within 15 min of ingestion (Kim et al., 2013; Frost et al., 2015).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2015

  • In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that approximately 30-45% of ingested phagosomes are LC3B-positive.

    “While LC3B-II-opsin association is clearly observed (Fig. 10), the extent of LC3B-II association with opsin-positive phagosomes remains unclear; in vitro (Frost et al., 2015) and in vivo (Dhingra et al., 2018) studies suggest that ~30–45% of ingested phagosomes are LC3B-positive.”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2015

  • A portion of OS phagosomes in the RPE recruit microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) in a process known as LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP).

    “In addition to the phagocytic machinery discussed in the preceding section, a portion of OS phagosomes in the RPE recruit microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) in a process known as LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) (Kim et al., 2013; Frost et al., 2015).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2015

  • LAP is an autophagosome-independent process and does not require the upstream components needed for initiating or regulating classical autophagy.

    “LAP is an autophagosome-independent process (Frost et al., 2015; Martinez et al., 2015; Klionsky et al., 2016), and does not require the upstream components needed for initiating or regulating classical autophagy.”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2015

  • LC3B-II recruitment occurs on single-membraned phagosomes, unlike the double-membraned autophagosomes in classical autophagy.

    “In addition, LC3B-II recruitment occurs on single-membraned phagosomes, unlike the double-membraned autophagosomes in classical autophagy (Frost et al., 2015; Martinez et al., 2015; Klionsky et al., 2016).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Frost et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, L. S., Lopes, V. S., Bragin, A., Reyes-Reveles, J., Brancato, J., Cohen, A., Mitchell, C. H., Williams, D. S., & Boesze-Battaglia, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2014-10-10
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
1135-1151
ISSN
  • 0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1182
OpenAlex
W2330533782
Cited by
63
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (EY001583, R01EY013434, R01EY010420, P30-EY00331, R01 EY07042, R21EY018705, R01EY007042, P30EY001583, P30EY000331)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE022465)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
LC3-associated phagocytosis, retinal pigment epithelium, photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis, autophagy, phagosome-lysosome fusion, ATG5, cargo sorting, macrophages
MeSH terms
Autophagy-Related Protein 5, Animals, Autophagy, Carrier Proteins, Cattle, Circadian Rhythm, Eye Proteins, Humans, Macrophages, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Phagocytosis, Phagosomes, Sirolimus, Protein Transport, Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transport, Multiprotein Complexes, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Retinal Pigment Epithelium, Retinal Photoreceptor Cell Outer Segment, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review