CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,374Resilience and Mental HealthOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies

Open access
LUTHAR, SUNIYA S., CICCHETTI, DANTE·2000·Development and Psychopathology
DOI 10.1017/s0954579400004156PMC PMC1903337
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The focus of this article is on the interface between research on resilience—a construct representing positive adaptation despite adversity —and the applications of this work to the development of interventions and social policies. Salient defining features of research on resilience are delineated, as are various advantages, limitations, and precautions linked with the application of the resilience framework to developing interventions. For future applied efforts within this tradition, a series of guiding principles are presented along with exemplars of existing programs based on the resilience paradigm. The article concludes with discussions of directions for future work in this area, with emphases on an enhanced interface between science and practice, and a broadened scope of resilience-based interventions in terms of the types of populations, and the types of adjustment domains, that are encompassed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579400004156

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 119 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LUTHAR, S. S., & CICCHETTI, D.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
ORCID
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2000-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
857-885
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
DOI
10.1017/s0954579400004156
PMC
PMC1903337
OpenAlex
W2107360293
Cited by
2,374
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 170 · 2023: 182 · 2022: 169 · 2021: 177 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 85
FWCI
13.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 46 d)
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH45027, R01MH045027, R01MH054643)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA010726, R01-DA11498, R01-DA10726, R01DA011498, R01DA014385)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
resilience, positive adaptation, adversity, resilience interventions, social policy, research-practice interface, intervention development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Humans, Mental Health Services, Public Policy, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review