Cited by 993Resilience and Mental HealthChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Resilience in children threatened by extreme adversity: Frameworks for research, practice, and translational synergy

Masten, Ann S.·2011·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

This article delineates parallel frameworks that grew out of the research on risk and resilience over the past four decades, a framework for research and a framework for practice, and then discusses the promise of an emerging synthesis. The research framework defined the meaning, models, and methods that successfully guided four waves of research to date on the nature and processes involved in human resilience. The applied framework emerged in response to urgent needs of children and families faced by adversity and those charged with helping them, resulting in guidelines for translating the unfolding but incomplete research evidence into action. The application of a resilience approach transformed practice in many fields concerned with promoting resilience in people at risk for problems, revolutionizing the mission, models, measures, and methods of practice to align with the emphasis on positive adaptation and strengths defining a resilience-based approach. Yet these interventions rarely translated back to inform and refine resilience theory in ways that would accelerate progress to promote resilience more effectively. The concluding section on translational synergy discusses the potential for a synthesis of basic and applied resilience frameworks as the next steps toward realizing the original objective and promise of resilience science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579411000198

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masten, A. S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Masten, Ann S.
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2011-04-18
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
493-506
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2043326867
Cited by
993
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 25
FWCI
45.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH085987)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
resilience, children, risk and resilience, resilience interventions, translational research, positive adaptation, strengths-based approach, family support, resilience theory
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Life Change Events, Resilience, Psychological, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review