The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization
Abstract
This study examined the effects of being victimized by peers on children's behavioral, social, emotional, and academic functioning. We assessed an ethnically diverse sample of 2,064 first, second, and fourth graders and followed them over 2 years, locating 1,469 of the participants at the follow-up. Correlation and partial correlation analyses revealed that prior victimization predicted externalizing, internalizing, and social problems 2 years later for the sample as a whole. However, not all victimized children experienced the same types of outcomes; instead, there was heterogeneity in children's responses to victimization. Using cluster analysis, we identified eight outcome patterns that represented different patterns of functioning. These were labeled as externalizing, internalizing, symptomatic, popular, disliked, absent, low achieving, and high achieving. Discriminant function analyses revealed that the symptomatic, externalizing, and disliked patterns were systematically related to victimization. Moreover, significant gender and age differences in the severity of effects were obtained. The discussion highlights the complexity of victimization effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aldenderfer, M. S. (1984) · Cited by 2,502
Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1997) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01993.x · Cited by 586
Learning of aggression in children
Eron, L. D., Walder, L. O., & Lefkowitz, M. M. (1971) · Cited by 272
Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates
Luthar, S. S., & McMahon, T. J. (1996) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · Cited by 197
Cited by
Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009 · Cited by 1,440
Bullying in Schools: The Power of Bullies and the Plight of Victims
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115030 · Cited by 907
Association Between Bullying and Psychosomatic Problems: A Meta-analysis
Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1215 · Cited by 833
What Can Be Done About School Bullying?: Linking Research to Educational Practice
Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09357622 · Cited by 672
Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools
(2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203106525 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- HANISH, L. D., & GUERRA, N. G.
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-89
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W2138021410
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0954579402001049
- The paper
- HANISH, L. D., & GUERRA, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579402001049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.