Cited by 131Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

benefits of positive human interaction for socially-housed chimpanzees

Open access
Baker, KC·2004·Animal Welfare

Abstract

Human interaction as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other primates is widely promoted and believed to be of value, but has been subject to little objective evaluation. This study assessed the effects of positive human interaction (eg relaxed treat feeding, playing, and other forms of social interaction compatible with personnel safety) on the behaviour of adult chimpanzees. Subjects were housed indoors in groups of two or three individuals. The level of interaction during routine care and management (ie in the process of cleaning, feeding, and monitoring) represented the baseline condition. The test condition involved a familiar caretaker spending an additional 10 minutes per day, 5 days a week, with each chimpanzee. This study was designed to assess carry-over effects of interaction on behaviour outside of the context of care staff presence. Therefore, in all phases of the study, data (97 hours of focal animal sampling) were collected only when caretakers were absent from the building. During the increased human interaction phase, the chimpanzees groomed each other more and showed lower levels of the following behaviours: regurgitation/reingestion, other oral abnormal behaviours, inactivity, and reactivity to the displays of neighboring groups. A trend toward reduced agonistic displaying was detected as well. Attempted interactions with the observer shifted significantly from predominantly aggressive to predominantly affiliative in nature. These results suggest that simple, unstructured affiliation between humans and chimpanzees should be a valued component of behavioural management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0962728600026981

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chimpanzees given an additional 10 min a day of positive interaction with a familiar caretaker groomed each other more and displayed lower levels of abnormal behaviour.

    “One study on chimpanzees showed that an additional 10 min a day of positive interaction with a familiar caretaker resulted in chimpanzees grooming each other more and displaying lower levels of abnormal behaviour [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Baker K C and Aureli F 1996 The neighbour effect: other groups influence intragroup agonistic behaviour in captive chim- panzees. American Journal of Primatology 40: 283-291
  2. Baker K, Bloomsmith M, Griffis C and Gierhart M 2003 Self- injurious behavior and response to human interaction as enrich- ment in rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 60: 94-95
  3. Baker K C and Ross S K 1998 Outdoor access: the behaviour- al benefits to chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 45: 166 (Abstract)
  4. Bloomsmith M A, Alford P L and Maple T L 1988 Successful feeding enrichment for captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 16: 155-164
  5. Bloomsmith M A, Baker K C, Ross S K and Lambeth S P 1999 Comparing animal training to non-training human interac- tion as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 49: 35-36 (Abstract)
  6. Boinski S, Gross T S and Davis J K 1999 Terrestrial predator alarm vocalizations are a valid monitor of stress in captive brown capuchins (Cebus apel/a). Zoo Biology 18: 295-312 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600026981 Published online by Cambridge University Press
  7. Perlman J, Guhad F A, Lambeth S, Fleming T, Lee D, Martin M and Schapiro S 200 I Using positive reinforcement training techniques to facilitate the assessment of parasites in cap- tive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 54: 56 (Abstract) Reinhardt V I997a Training nonhuman primates to cooperate dur- ing blood collection: a review. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 36: 1-4 Reinhardt V 1997b Training nonhuman primates to cooperate during handling procedures: a review. Animal Technology 48: 55-73
  8. Wollle T L 1987 Control of stress using non-drug approaches. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 191: 1219-1221

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, K.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, KC
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2004-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
239-245
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W4315698529
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RR‐00165)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P51RR000165)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
chimpanzees, human interaction, environmental enrichment, social housing, affiliative behavior, grooming, regurgitation, agonistic behavior, behavior management, residual effects, zoo animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review