benefits of positive human interaction for socially-housed chimpanzees
Open accessAbstract
Human interaction as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other primates is widely promoted and believed to be of value, but has been subject to little objective evaluation. This study assessed the effects of positive human interaction (eg relaxed treat feeding, playing, and other forms of social interaction compatible with personnel safety) on the behaviour of adult chimpanzees. Subjects were housed indoors in groups of two or three individuals. The level of interaction during routine care and management (ie in the process of cleaning, feeding, and monitoring) represented the baseline condition. The test condition involved a familiar caretaker spending an additional 10 minutes per day, 5 days a week, with each chimpanzee. This study was designed to assess carry-over effects of interaction on behaviour outside of the context of care staff presence. Therefore, in all phases of the study, data (97 hours of focal animal sampling) were collected only when caretakers were absent from the building. During the increased human interaction phase, the chimpanzees groomed each other more and showed lower levels of the following behaviours: regurgitation/reingestion, other oral abnormal behaviours, inactivity, and reactivity to the displays of neighboring groups. A trend toward reduced agonistic displaying was detected as well. Attempted interactions with the observer shifted significantly from predominantly aggressive to predominantly affiliative in nature. These results suggest that simple, unstructured affiliation between humans and chimpanzees should be a valued component of behavioural management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chimpanzees given an additional 10 min a day of positive interaction with a familiar caretaker groomed each other more and displayed lower levels of abnormal behaviour.
“One study on chimpanzees showed that an additional 10 min a day of positive interaction with a familiar caretaker resulted in chimpanzees grooming each other more and displaying lower levels of abnormal behaviour [27].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Baker K C and Aureli F 1996 The neighbour effect: other groups influence intragroup agonistic behaviour in captive chim- panzees. American Journal of Primatology 40: 283-291
- Baker K, Bloomsmith M, Griffis C and Gierhart M 2003 Self- injurious behavior and response to human interaction as enrich- ment in rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 60: 94-95
- Baker K C and Ross S K 1998 Outdoor access: the behaviour- al benefits to chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 45: 166 (Abstract)
- Bloomsmith M A, Alford P L and Maple T L 1988 Successful feeding enrichment for captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 16: 155-164
- Bloomsmith M A, Baker K C, Ross S K and Lambeth S P 1999 Comparing animal training to non-training human interac- tion as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 49: 35-36 (Abstract)
- Boinski S, Gross T S and Davis J K 1999 Terrestrial predator alarm vocalizations are a valid monitor of stress in captive brown capuchins (Cebus apel/a). Zoo Biology 18: 295-312 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600026981 Published online by Cambridge University Press
- Perlman J, Guhad F A, Lambeth S, Fleming T, Lee D, Martin M and Schapiro S 200 I Using positive reinforcement training techniques to facilitate the assessment of parasites in cap- tive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 54: 56 (Abstract) Reinhardt V I997a Training nonhuman primates to cooperate dur- ing blood collection: a review. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 36: 1-4 Reinhardt V 1997b Training nonhuman primates to cooperate during handling procedures: a review. Animal Technology 48: 55-73
- Wollle T L 1987 Control of stress using non-drug approaches. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 191: 1219-1221
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
New directions for zoo animal welfare science
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“One study on chimpanzees showed that an additional 10 min a day of positive interaction with a familiar caretaker resulted in chimpanzees grooming each other more and displaying lower levels of abnormal behaviour [27].”
BackgroundA preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo
Hosey, G. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Individual differences in temperament and behavioral management practices for nonhuman primates
Coleman, K. (2012) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.002 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Hosey, G., & Melfi, V. (2015) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21182 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Identification of major welfare issues for captive elephant husbandry by stakeholders
Gurusamy, V, Tribe, A., & Phillips, C. (2014) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.23.1.011 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baker, K.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, KC
- ORCID
- Baker, KC
- Venue
- Animal Welfare
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-245
- ISSN
- 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-1538
- PMC
- PMC2875797
- OpenAlex
- W4315698529
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (RR‐00165)
- National Center for Research Resources (P51RR000165)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- chimpanzees, human interaction, environmental enrichment, social housing, affiliative behavior, grooming, regurgitation, agonistic behavior, behavior management, residual effects, zoo animal welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review