Cited by 61Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Progression in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia: A Longitudinal Study

Open access
Devenney, Emma, Bartley, Lauren, Hoon, Chris, O’Callaghan, Claire, Kumfor, Fiona, Hornberger, Michael, Kwok, John B., Halliday, Glenda M. +3 more·2015·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: A gap in the literature exists regarding progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (BVFTD). Guidance is needed concerning markers that will enable clinicians to discriminate FTD more effectively from phenocopies and to identify factors that determine progression and thereby prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To observe longitudinal outcomes and progression in probable and possible BVFTD in accordance with international diagnostic criteria and to identify features that may aid clinicians to prognosticate better in cases of possible BVFTD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal cohort study performed in a specialist tertiary FTD research clinic. Fifty-eight consecutive patients were followed up longitudinally from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013, and classified as having possible, probable, or definite BVFTD at presentation and latest review. Final follow-up was completed on December 31, 2013, and data were analyzed from January 1 to August 1, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical, pathological, genetic, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging data were analyzed to categorize patients, to compare differences between groups with changed and unchanged diagnoses, to determine rates of progression in BVFTD, and to identify prognostic features in possible BVFTD. RESULTS: At presentation, 38 of the 58 patients fulfilled criteria for probable BVFTD; of these, 36 continued to satisfy probable criteria or underwent conversion to definite criteria over time. The remaining 20 patients satisfied possible criteria only, and 11 of these patients changed categories over time to probable or definite BVFTD and showed progression on cognitive and functional measures (termed changed status). Of these 11 patients, 8 (73%) carried the C9orf72 expansion. A positive family history, memory impairment, and clinical abnormalities at presentation were key features of progression (P < .05). A continuum of neuropsychological scores, progression rates, and atrophy severity emerged across patients in probable, possible, changed status, and nonchanged status groups; patients with probable BVFTD exhibited the most severe abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Behavioral variant FTD shows variable progression over time. Clinicians can use a detailed neurologic and cognitive assessment to identify key predictive features of progression when faced with possible BVFTD, whereas a diagnosis of probable BVFTD is accurate in a clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2061

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (WMS-III). London, England: Psychological Corp; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devenney, E., Bartley, L., Hoon, C., O’Callaghan, C., Kumfor, F., Hornberger, M., Kwok, J. B., Halliday, G. M., Kiernan, M. C., Piguet, O., & Hodges, J. R.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (AU)
Corresponding author
Devenney, Emma
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
72
Issue
12
Pages
1501
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1882871811
Cited by
61
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Neuroscience Research Australia
  • Motor Neurone Disease Association
  • University of New South Wales
  • Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (CE110001021, 1037746)
  • Isaac Newton Trust
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1022684, 1037746)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, disease progression, prognostic factors, C9orf72 expansion, family history, memory impairment, brain atrophy, neuropsychological assessment, frontotemporal lobar degeneration
MeSH terms
C9orf72 Protein, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Proteins, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Statistics, Nonparametric, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review