Cited by 43Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Empirically Grounded Clinical Interventions Clients' and Referrers' Perceptions of Computer-Guided CBT (FearFighter)

Open access
MacGregor, Alastair D., Hayward, Linda, Peck, David F., Wilkes, Peter·2009·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: Computer-guided CBT has been shown to be a potentially useful way of closing the gap between the demand and supply for CBT. Moreover, this approach has additional benefits in terms of less travel times for treatment, accessibility in remote and unusual locations, increased confidentiality, easier disclosure of sensitive information, and more egalitarian therapist-client interactions. Research on computerized CBT has concentrated on clinical outcomes, but the views of clients on this treatment approach have been relatively neglected. Aims: The aims were to assess client satisfaction, professionals' views, and ease of programme use after completion of treatment via an internet-based CBT programme for panic and phobic anxiety (FearFighter). Method: A feasibility and effectiveness study of FearFighter was conducted in remote and rural areas of Scotland. Treatment data are available for 35 clients at post-treatment, of whom 29 completed an 18-item set of rating scales designed to assess satisfaction, including ease of use, accessibility, how far needs were met, whether changes to the programme were required, the benefits and drawbacks of not having a therapist, and quality of support. Open-ended questions were included. Referring agencies were also asked to rate their views on FearFighter. Results: Clients reported moderate to high levels of improvement and of overall satisfaction; very few difficulties in logging on to and using the programme were encountered. Similar levels of satisfaction with the programme were reported by referrers. Conclusions: It is concluded that computer-guided CBT is acceptable to clients and to professionals, and that it could play a valuable part in a “stepped care” system of delivering CBT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s135246580800492x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eight papers regarding six different trials measured rural location as a predictor of outcomes, adherence, or acceptability.

    “Eight papers regarding six different trials measured rural location as a predictor of outcomes, adherence, or acceptability [38-45].”

    From Computerized cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety and depression in rural areas:a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Method and Introduction describe a FearFighter study in rural Scotland that assessed clients’ satisfaction and referrers’ views. The Discussion reports satisfaction among rural patients, but does not report measuring rural location as a predictor of outcomes, adherence, or acceptability. This paper alone also cannot substantiate the citing sentence’s count of eight papers and six trials. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of the quasi-experimental studies, the risk in one study was unclear due to insufficient information on several variables and moderate in another, due to low numbers of participants completing the outcome measurements.

    “Of the quasi-experimental studies, the risk in one study was unclear due to insufficient information on several variables [44] and moderate in another [45], due to low numbers of participants completing the outcome measurements.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacGregor, A. D., Hayward, L., Peck, D. F., & Wilkes, P.
Affiliations
  • NHS Highland (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Peck, David F.
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2008-11-26
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2158748444
Cited by
43
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
internet-based CBT, panic disorder, phobic anxiety, client satisfaction, ease of use, accessibility (transport and spatial geography), stepped care, therapist-client interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Rural Population, Scotland, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Patient Satisfaction, Empirical Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review