Cited by 14Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

An open trial in the NHS of Blues Begone®: a new home based computerized CBT program

Purves, David G., Bennett, Mary, Wellman, Nigel·2009·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer based treatment for depression and anxiety has been available for several years and has demonstrated useful clinical effects. Most existing computerized CBT products in the UK that are designed to treat depression and co-morbid anxiety require patients to visit a clinic and require staff input to manage the process. Such intervention adds to the costs and bottlenecks in delivering a clinically effective treatment with mass availability. Internet treatment options are becoming more readily available, although data to support use are not yet strong, and most still require human assessment and telephone support. Blues Begone is a new computerized CBT program that has been designed to be used at home with minimal human support. METHOD: This pilot project provides data from an open trial of Blues Begone with both primary and secondary care patients. RESULTS: One hundred patients started Blues Begone, 58 completed the program, 72% (n = 42) of completers achieved reliable change and (n = 36) 62% achieved both reliable and clinically significant change, and may be considered to have recovered by the end of the program. CONCLUSION: These data provide the first demonstration of the potential viability of Blues Begone as a home based computerized treatment for depression and anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465809990282

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purves, D. G., Bennett, M., & Wellman, N.
Affiliations
  • London Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of West London (GB)
Corresponding author
Purves, David G.
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2009-08-25
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
541-551
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W1967379081
Cited by
14
References
21
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
home-based therapy, depression, anxiety, online therapy, primary care, secondary care, National Health Service, treatment completion, reliable change
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Personality Inventory, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Self Care, Software, State Medicine, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review