Cited by 65Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The role of computer‐aided psychotherapy within an NHS CBT specialist service

Open access
Learmonth, Despina, Trosh, Jo, Rai, Sadik, Sewell, Janet, Cavanagh, Kate·2008·Counselling and Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

To date, the feasibility of computer‐aided psychotherapy as an intervention has only been recognised in primary care practice. The present study sought to evaluate the impact of ‘Beating the Blues’ (BtB), an established computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (CCBT) self‐help programme for the management of anxiety and depression, within an NHS CBT specialist healthcare centre. Of the 555 service users who used BtB as part of routine care, with follow‐up assessment at six to eight weeks, 71% completed all eight sessions. Statistically significant differences on the Beck Depression Inventory‐II (BDI‐II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were found in completer and intention‐to‐treat analyses; 50% of completers achieved reliable change on the BDI‐II and approximately 25% of completers achieved reliable and clinically significant change on both measures. Outcomes were benchmarked against outcomes in studies of routine face‐to‐face CBT. These findings provide evidence that BtB may be of value to service users in secondary mental healthcare centres, alleviating current burdens on public health and therapeutic resources. Future research directions should include examining which factors influence individuals’ decisions to try computer‐aided psychotherapy, which individuals are best suited to using these interventions, and why some users drop out prior to programme completion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14733140801976290

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Learmonth, D., Trosh, J., Rai, S., Sewell, J., & Cavanagh, K.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • CBT Department Chelmsford and Essex Centre Chelmsford UK
  • Independent research consultant Newcastle UK
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Learmonth, Despina
Venue
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05-07
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
117-123
ISSN
  • 1473-3145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1405
OpenAlex
W2164641243
Cited by
65
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Counselling and Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
self-help programs, anxiety, depression, treatment completion, treatment discontinuation, treatment outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review