The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive sequelae of blast-related versus other mechanisms of brain trauma
Abstract
The use of improvised explosive devices has become the hallmark of modern warfare and has resulted in an ever-increasing number of blast-related traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Despite this fact, very little is actually known about the cognitive sequelae of blast-related TBIs. The purpose of the current study was to compare patterns of performance on neuropsychological measures in subjects who have sustained TBIs as a result of blast (or explosion) with those who have sustained TBIs from non-blast or blunt force trauma (motor vehicle accident, fall, assault, etc.). Participants were categorized as blast-related TBI or non-blast-related TBI and according to severity of injury (mild or moderate-to-severe). No main effects were observed in analysis of covariance between blast-related TBI participants and non-blast-related TBI participants across any of the neuropsychological variables, although an interaction was observed on a visual memory test showing stronger performance for mild blast-related and poorer performance for moderate-to-severe blast-related participants compared with both non-blast groups. Overall, the results do not provide any strong evidence that blast is categorically different from other TBI mechanisms, at least with regard to cognitive sequelae on select measures. Additional findings included a marginally increased incidence of reported posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among blast-injured participants. (JINS, 2009, 15, 1–8.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq
Hoge, C. W., McGurk, D., Thomas, J. L., Cox, A. L., Engel, C. C., & Castro, C. A. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072972 · Cited by 2,775
Definition of mild traumatic brain injury
&NA;, &. (1993) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-199309000-00010 · Cited by 1,910
Milliken, C. S., Auchterlonie, J. L., & Hoge, C. W. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.18.2141 · Cited by 1,640
BELANGER, H. G., CURTISS, G., DEMERY, J. A., LEBOWITZ, B. K., & VANDERPLOEG, R. D. (2005) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617705050277 · Cited by 715
Self-citation
Cited by
Fortier, C. B., Amick, M. M., Grande, L., McGlynn, S., Kenna, A., Morra, L., Clark, A., Milberg, W. P., & McGlinchey, R. E. (2014) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e3182865859 · Cited by 193
Irvine, C. A., Eigsti, I.-M., & Fein, D. A. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2651-y · Cited by 70
Crozier, J. C., Wang, L., Huettel, S. A., & De Bellis, M. D. (2014) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s095457941400008x · Cited by 64
Influence of blast exposure on cognitive functioning in combat veterans.
Martindale, S. L., Ord, A. S., & Rowland, J. A. (2020) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000672 · Cited by 30
Soble, J. R., Spanierman, L. B., & Fitzgerald Smith, J. (2013) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2013.798398 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- BELANGER, H. G., KRETZMER, T., YOASH-GANTZ, R., PICKETT, T., & TUPLER, L. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7661
- OpenAlex
- W2141847963
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.