Cited by 292Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): A brief, sensitive, and specific tool to assess executive functions in dementia–CORRECTED VERSION

TORRALVA, TERESA, ROCA, MARÍA, GLEICHGERRCHT, EZEQUIEL, LÓPEZ, PABLO, MANES, FACUNDO·2009·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Although several brief sensitive screening tools are available to detect cognitive dysfunction, few have been developed to quickly assess executive functioning (EF) per se. We designed a new brief tool to evaluate EF in neurodegenerative diseases. Patients with an established diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD; n = 22), Alzheimer disease (AD; n = 25), and controls (n = 26) were assessed with a cognitive screening test, the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS), and EF tests. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) scores were obtained for all patients. Internal consistency of the IFS was very good (Cronbach's alpha = .80). IFS total (out of 30 points) was 27.4 (SD = 1.6) for controls, 15.6 (SD = 4.2) for bvFTD, and 20.1 (SD = 4.7) for AD. Using a cutoff of 25 points, sensitivity of the IFS was 96.2%, and specificity 91.5% in differentiating controls from patients with dementia. The IFS correlated significantly with the CDR and executive tasks. The IFS total discriminated controls from demented patients, and bvFTD from AD. IFS is a brief, sensitive, and specific tool for the detection of executive dysfunction associated with neurodegenerative diseases. The IFS may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of FTD and AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617709990415

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Screening tools of executive functions such as the FAB and IFS can provide information on executive capacities in neurodegenerative and psychiatric conditions.

    “Screening tools of executive functions such as The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) (Dubois et al. , 2000) and The Institute of Cognitive Neurology Frontal Screening (IFS) (Torralva et al. , 2009) can provide information on executive capacities in neurodegenerative and psychiatric conditions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TORRALVA, T., ROCA, M., GLEICHGERRCHT, E., LÓPEZ, P., & MANES, F.
Affiliations
  • Favaloro University (AR)
  • Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva (AR)
Corresponding author
TORRALVA, TERESA
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
777-786
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2151627270
Cited by
292
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
executive function, dementia screening, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, neurodegenerative diseases, differential diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity, Clinical Dementia Rating, frontal lobe dysfunction
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review