Cited by 170Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Cognitive impairment and functioning in PTSD related to intimate partner violence

TWAMLEY, ELIZABETH W., ALLARD, CAROLYN B., THORP, STEVEN R., NORMAN, SONYA B., HAMI CISSELL, SHADHA, HUGHES BERARDI, KELLY, GRIMES, ERIN M., STEIN, MURRAY B.·2009·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been associated with neuropsychological impairments across multiple domains, but consensus regarding the cognitive profile of PTSD has not been reached. In this study of women with PTSD related to intimate partner violence (n = 55) and healthy, demographically similar comparison participants (NCs; n = 20), we attempted to control for many potential confounds in PTSD samples. All participants were assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery emphasizing executive functioning, including inhibition, switching, and abstraction. NCs outperformed PTSD participants on most neuropsychological measures, but the differences were significant only on speeded tasks (with and without executive functioning components). The PTSD group’s mean performance was within the average range on all neuropsychological tests. Within the PTSD group, more severe PTSD symptoms were associated with slower processing speed, and more severe dissociative symptoms were associated with poorer reasoning performance. These results suggest that women with PTSD related to intimate partner violence demonstrate slower than normal processing speed, which is associated with the severity of psychiatric symptoms. We speculate that the cognitive slowing seen in PTSD may be attributable to reduced attention due to a need to allocate resources to cope with psychological distress or unpleasant internal experiences. (JINS, 2009, 15, 879–887.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s135561770999049x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TWAMLEY, E. W., ALLARD, C. B., THORP, S. R., NORMAN, S. B., HAMI CISSELL, S., HUGHES BERARDI, K., GRIMES, E. M., & STEIN, M. B.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
TWAMLEY, ELIZABETH W.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2009-11
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
879-887
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W1967590318
Cited by
170
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, intimate partner violence, cognitive impairment, processing speed, executive function, inhibition, cognitive slowing, dissociative symptoms, reasoning, women, attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Crime Victims, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review