Cited by 45Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Examining predictors of reaction times in children with ADHD and normal controls

Open access
EPSTEIN, JEFFERY N., HWANG, MICHELLE E., ANTONINI, TANYA, LANGBERG, JOSHUA M., ALTAYE, MEKIBIB, ARNOLD, L. EUGENE·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

A microanalysis of task events in a common go/no-go task was completed to examine how task events impact individual reaction times. Predictors of long reaction times were analyzed to better understand increased intra-individual variability (IIV) among children with ADHD compared with normal controls. Sixty-five children with ADHD and 65 normal controls matched on gender, ethnicity, and age completed a go/no-go task. Children across both groups were slower before and after omission errors than all other trials. They were also slower on the trial before successfully inhibiting their response to no-go trials. Children with ADHD exhibited a pronounced slowing on trials prior to omission errors and trials prior to successful inhibitions compared with the normal control group. Pre-error slowing in children with ADHD may represent the beginning stages of attentional disengagement that subsequently results in the absence of responding (i.e., errors of omission or successful inhibition). While these event-related increases in reaction time explain some of the increased IIV observed in children with ADHD, the removal of these trials did not remove the pronounced between-group differences in IIV, suggesting that additional unmeasured processes are contributing to IIV in children with ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617709991111

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ADHD research, reaction time variability is typically interpreted as reflecting occasional lapses in attention.

    “In ADHD research, RTV in ADHD is typically interpreted (at least implicitly) as reflecting occasional lapses in attention”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [33]

  • Children with ADHD show pronounced slowing on the trial before an omission error and less pronounced slowing on trials following an omission error.

    “Children with ADHD demonstrated pronounced slowing (i.e., long RTs) on the trial before an omission error, as well as slowing, although not nearly as pronounced, on trials following an omission error.”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Benjamini Yoav Hochberg Yosef 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 57 289 300
  2. Cohen J 1988 Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2 New York Academic Press
  3. Luce RD 1986 Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization New York Oxford University Press
  4. Rieger M Gauggel S 1999 Inhibitory after-effects in the stop signal paradigm British Journal of Psychology 90 509 518

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EPSTEIN, J. N., HWANG, M. E., ANTONINI, T., LANGBERG, J. M., ALTAYE, M., & ARNOLD, L. E.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
EPSTEIN, JEFFERY N.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
138-147
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2099599198
Cited by
45
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • University of Cambridge
  • National Institutes of Health (n01mh012012-001)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (UO1 MH50453, UO1 MH50461, UO1 MH-50454, UO1 MH50440, U01MH050467, U01MH050447, U01MH050440, UO1 MH50477, UO1MH50467, N01 MH012012, U01MH050453, U01MH050461, U01MH050454)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, reaction time, within-person variability, go/no-go task, omission errors, response inhibition, attentional disengagement, children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review