Cited by 93Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Stimulant Treatment Reduces Lapses in Attention among Children with ADHD: The Effects of Methylphenidate on Intra-Individual Response Time Distributions

Open access
Spencer, Sarah V., Hawk, Larry W., Richards, Jerry B., Shiels, Keri, Pelham, William E., Waxmonsky, James G.·2009·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that intra-individual variability in reaction time (RT) distributions of children with ADHD is characterized by a particularly large rightward skew that may reflect lapses in attention. The purpose of the study was to provide the first randomized, placebo-controlled test of the effects of the stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) on this tail and other RT distribution characteristics. Participants were 49 9- to 12-year-old children with ADHD. Children participated in a 3-day double-blind, placebo-controlled medication assessment during which they received long-acting MPH (Concerta), with the nearest equivalents of 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg t.i.d. immediate-release MPH. Children completed a simple two-choice speeded discrimination task on and off of medication. Mode RT and deviation from the mode were used to examine the peak and skew, respectively, of RT distributions. MPH significantly reduced the peak and skew of RT distributions. Importantly, the two medication effects were uncorrelated suggesting that MPH works to improve both the speed and variability in responding. The improvement in variability with stimulant treatment is interpreted as a reduction in lapses in attention. This, in turn, may reflect stimulant enhancement of self-regulatory processes theorized to be at the core of ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-009-9316-2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of acute methylphenidate on reaction time variability in a simple choice discrimination task was moderately correlated with its effect on reducing omissions on a separate continuous performance task.

    “Consistent with this interpretation, Spencer et al. [43] observed that the effect of acute methylphenidate on RTV in a simple choice discrimination task was moderately correlated with the effect of the same medication in being able to reduce omissions on a separate continuous performance task.”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [43]

  • Other studies show that medication reduces tau and reduces the peak and skew of reaction time distributions.

    “These results suggest that medication specifically reduces intermittent long RTs, which is consistent with other studies showing that medication reduces tau [100] and reduces the peak and skew of RT distributions [43].”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [43]

  • These results suggest that medication specifically reduces intermittent long reaction times.

    “These results suggest that medication specifically reduces intermittent long RTs, which is consistent with other studies showing that medication reduces tau [100] and reduces the peak and skew of RT distributions [43].”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [43]

  • Psychostimulant treatment improves DFN suppression during active task engagement and decreases reaction time variability in youth with ADHD.

    “psychostimulant treatment has been found to improve DFN suppression during active task engagement in youth with ADHD (Peterson et al., 2009), as well as to decrease reaction time variability (Spencer et al., 2009).”
  • Increased variability in reaction time is among the most consistently reported deficits in children with ADHD.

    “increased variability in reaction time (RT) is among the most consistently reported deficits in children with ADHD (Castellanos et al., 2002b; Russell et al., 2006; Spencer et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bickel DR Robust and efficient estimation of the mode of continuous data: The mode as a viable measure of central tendency Journal of Statistical Computation & Stimulation 2003 73 899 912
  2. Nigg JT What Causes ADHD? Understanding what goes wrong and why 2006 Guilford Press New York
  3. Pelham WE Pharmacotherapy for children with ADHD School Psychology Review 1993 22 199 227
  4. Riccio CA Waldrop J Reynolds C Lowe P Effects of stimulants on the continuous performance test (CPT): Implications for CPT use and interpretation Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience 2001 13 326 335 11514638
  5. Smith BH Barkley RA Shapiro CJ Mash EJ Barkley RA Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment of Childhood Disorders 2006 65 120 Guilford Press New York 3rd ed.
  6. Van der Molen MW Neumann O Sanders AF Energetics and the reaction process: Running threads Through experimental psychology Handbook of Perception & Action 1996 3 229 275 Academic Press London
  7. Wechsler D Kaplan E Fein D Kramer J Morris R Delis D Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition-Integrated, technical and interpretive manual 2004 Harcourt Assessment, Inc. San Antonio, TX

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, S. V., Hawk, L. W., Richards, J. B., Shiels, K., Pelham, W. E., & Waxmonsky, J. G.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Hawk, Larry W.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2009-03-17
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
805-816
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2069028385
Cited by
93
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH069434, MH069434)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, stimulant medication, attentional lapses, reaction time distribution, reaction time variability, processing speed, self-regulation, children
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, New York, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review