Cited by 153Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anorexia, bulimia, and obesity: Shared decision making deficits on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)

BROGAN, AMY, HEVEY, DAVID, PIGNATTI, RICCARDO·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

The pathological eating behaviors in Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Bulimia Nervosa (BN), and obesity are characterized by a preference for high immediate reward, despite higher future losses in terms of both physical and psychological outcomes. The present study compared the decision making profile of females with a diagnosis of AN (n = 22), BN (n = 17), obesity (n = 18), and a healthy weight comparison group (n = 20) using a standardized neuropsychological test, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). The three clinical groups (AN, BN, obesity) were significantly impaired on the IGT compared with the comparison group on both overall task performance and task learning; however, the three clinical groups were not significantly different from each other. Sixty-one percent to 77% of the clinical groups reached the threshold for impairment on the IGT, compared with 15% of the comparison group. The potential basis for this shared decision making profile is discussed. (JINS, 2010, 16, 711–715.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617710000354

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of obese individuals have begun to show evidence of a preference for high immediate rewards despite an increased chance of higher future losses.

    “However, studies performed with obese individuals have begun to uncover evidence of a preference for high, immediate rewards, despite an increased chance of suffering higher future losses (100,101).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [100]

  • The few studies performed with obese individuals have uncovered evidence of a preference for high, immediate rewards, despite an increased chance of suffering higher future losses.

    “However, the few studies performed with obese individuals have also uncovered evidence of a preference for high, immediate rewards, despite an increased chance of suffering higher future losses (Brogan et al 2010;Weller et al 2008).”

    From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Brogan et al 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BROGAN, A., HEVEY, D., & PIGNATTI, R.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
Corresponding author
BROGAN, AMY
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2010-04-21
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
711-715
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2160041570
Cited by
153
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, obesity, shared decision-making, Iowa Gambling Task, decision-making deficits, impulsivity, reward processing, task learning, neuropsychological deficits
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia, Bulimia, Cognition Disorders, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Obesity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review