The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation.
Abstract
We examined the effects of study-abroad experience (SAE) and working-memory capacity (WMC) on the types of errors made during single-word translation from the first language to the second language, contrasting non-response with meaning errors (i.e. when individuals translate semantically-related words instead of the target word). SAE and WMC interacted; individuals with more SAE and higher WMC made as many meaning as non-response errors, whereas individuals in the other groups made more non-response than meaning errors. We conclude that SAE encourages the use of approximate translations to communicate, but only higher WMC learners can do so because this strategy requires multiple items to be maintained in memory simultaneously. A speech-production model is adapted to capture our results and demonstrate the effects of differential working memory demands on producing correct translations, meaning errors, and non-response errors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We used the Spanish adapted version of the procedure developed by Turner and Engle (1989) (Turner and Engle, 1989; Tokowicz et al., 2004; Redick et al., 2012).”
From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Tokowicz et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,017
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 · Cited by 2,656 · cited 3×
“This assumption is consistent with most models of bilingual language processing (e.g. the Concept Mediation Model of Potter, So, Von Eckhardt and Feldman (1984); the Distributed Feature Model of De Groot (1992); the Revised Hierarchical Model of Kroll and Stewart (1994)).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWorking Memory Capacity as Executive Attention
Engle, R. W. (2002) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00160 · Cited by 2,507
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR
Francis, W. N., Kučera, H., & Mackie, A. W. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,310
Is working memory capacity task dependent?
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(89)90040-5 · Cited by 2,299
The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728902003012 · Cited by 1,730
Monitoring and self-repair in speech.
Levelt, W. (1983) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4 · Cited by 1,676
Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals
Potter, M. C., So, K., Eckardt, B. V., & Feldman, L. B. (1984) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(84)90489-4 · Cited by 684
Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.561 · Cited by 683
First Language Use in Second Language Production
Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1994) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/15.1.36 · Cited by 496
Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context
Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(86)90018-5 · Cited by 492
Determinants of word translation.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1001 · Cited by 483
Forward and Backward Word Translation by Bilinguals
Degroot, A. M. B., Dannenburg, L., & Vanhell, J. G. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1029 · Cited by 437
Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.539 · Cited by 371
The development of lexical fluency in a second language
Kroll, J., Michael, E. B., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002) · Second language Research · doi:10.1191/0267658302sr201oa · Cited by 327
Self-citationMediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al (1991).
Dell, G. S., & O’Séaghdha, P. G. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.604 · Cited by 303
From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary
Talamas, A., Kroll, J., & Dufour, R. (1999) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728999000140 · Cited by 237
Self-citationThe Neural Bases of Strategy and Skill in Sentence–Picture Verification
Reichle, E. D., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.2000.0733 · Cited by 214
Simulating Cross-Language Competition with the Bilingual Interactive Activation Model
Dijkstra, T., van Heuven, W. J. B., & Grainger, J. (1998) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.933 · Cited by 141
Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming
Dell, G. S., Lawler, E. N., Harris, H. D., & Gordon, J. (2004) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290342000320 · Cited by 131
Being and Becoming Bilingual: Individual Differences and Consequences for Language Production
Michael, E. B., & Gollan, T. H. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195151770.003.0022 · Cited by 120
Self-citationHaxby, J. V., Parasuraman, R., Lalonde, F. M., & Abboud, H. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204531 · Cited by 95
Modelling anomia by the discrete two-stage word production architecture
Matti, L., Tikkala, A., & Martti, J. (1998) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/s0911-6044(97)00015-8 · Cited by 41
Word production in a Foreign Language
Hermans, D. (2000) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 30
Blanken, G., Dittmann, J., & Wallesch, C. (2002) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00227-6 · Cited by 25
The Semester Overseas: What Difference Does It Make?
DEKEYSER, R. M. (1991) · ADFL Bulletin · doi:10.1632/adfl.22.2.42 · Cited by 25
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KROLL, J. F., BOBB, S. C., & WODNIECKA, Z. (2006) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728906002483 · Cited by 764
Self-citationWorking memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 · Cited by 693
Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script?
Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.001 · Cited by 419
Self-citationAspects of working memory in L2 learning
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444810000509 · Cited by 249
Language history questionnaire: A Web-based interface for bilingual research
Li, P., Sepanski, S., & Zhao, X. (2006) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192770 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- TOKOWICZ, N., MICHAEL, E. B., & KROLL, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- Bilingualism Language and Cognition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-11-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-272
- ISSN
- 1366-7289 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1841
- OpenAlex
- W2118021841
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bilingualism Language and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- study abroad experience, working memory capacity, translation errors, nonresponse error, speech production models, bilingual translation, second language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
