The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience
Abstract
The language history questionnaire (LHQ) is an important tool for assessing the linguistic background and language proficiency of multilinguals or second language learners. Previously we developed a generic LHQ based on the most commonly asked questions in published studies (Li, Sepanski & Zhao, 2006) and provided a web-based interface (LHQ 2.0) that has flexibility in functionality, accuracy in data recording, and privacy for users and data (Li, Zhang, Tsai & Puls, 2014). LHQ3 (version 3) introduces new functions, developed in response to many comments/requests from users. One important improvement is the addition of an automatic scoring system, in that the new interface automatically calculates aggregated scores for language proficiency, language dominance, and language immersion levels. Finally, LHQ3 allows researchers to assign different weights to the modules when calculating the aggregated scores, addressing the issue of different focuses that different researchers put on multilingual speakers’ language usage and background.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067 · Cited by 1,991
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test--Fourth Edition
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15144-000 · Cited by 914
Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage
Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.795574 · Cited by 859
Anderson, J. A. E., Mak, L., Keyvani Chahi, A., & Bialystok, E. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0867-9 · Cited by 438
Language history questionnaire: A Web-based interface for bilingual research
Li, P., Sepanski, S., & Zhao, X. (2006) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192770 · Cited by 398
Self-citationLinck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x · Cited by 356
Bidelman, G. M., Gandour, J. T., & Krishnan, A. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21362 · Cited by 349
Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool
LI, P., ZHANG, F., TSAI, E., & PULS, B. (2014) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728913000606 · Cited by 332
Self-citationBilingualism, Language Proficiency, and Learning to Read in Two Writing Systems.
Bialystok, E., McBride-Chang, C., & Luk, G. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.580 · Cited by 295
RECENT RESEARCH ON AGE, SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, AND EARLY FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING
Nikolov, M., & Djigunović, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190506000122 · Cited by 291
Cited by
Callen, M. C. (2025) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728924000555 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X.
- Venue
- Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-04-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 938-944
- ISSN
- 1366-7289 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1841
- OpenAlex
- W2941281225
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 54.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1366728918001153
- The paper
- Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X. (2020). Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728918001153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
