Cited by 39Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchRisk Perception and Management

Predictors of Australian consumers' intentions to consume conventional and novel sources of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids

Open access
Cox, DN, Evans, G, Lease, HJ·2008·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives: To elicit predictors of variation in likelihood to purchase foods rich in long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. Design, setting and subjects: Responses from a community sample (n = 220) were elicited using a computer-administered questionnaire based on an adaptation of Protection Motivation Theory including measures of perceived risk and vulnerability to coronary heart disease (CHD). Other measures included health status, body mass index (BMI), perceived risk/benefits of novel technologies and sociodemographics. Descriptions of model products were presented, including farmed fish fed fishmeal (FFFF); farmed fish fed genetically modified (GM) oilseed (FFFGM); bread, milk and supplements containing fish oil (SFO) or GM oilseed. It was hypothesised that perceived vulnerability to CHD would enhance acceptance of GM products (H1). Furthermore, information describing the benefits of LCO3FA, limitations to fish supply and potential alternatives was given to a treatment group (50%) and hypothesised to have a positive effect on the acceptance of GM products (H2). Results: No evidence was found to support H1 or H2. FFFF was most likely to be purchased (P < 0.01), followed by SFO and FFFGM. Multivariate regression analysis identified significant (P < 0.05) predictors (standardised β) for likelihood to purchase FFFF: self-efficacy 0.56; behaviour (product) efficacy 0.19; belief that fishmeal is unnatural −0.14 (R2 = 0.44) and for FFFGM: self-efficacy 0.65; perceived severity of CHD 0.15; BMI −0.13; significant other has/had arthritis 0.11; belief that GM oilseed is unnatural 0.11 (R2 = 0.49). Conclusions: Self-efficacy (confidence to consume) was the most important predictor of likelihood to purchase all products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s136898000700016x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]5. National Academy of Sciences. Dietary Reference Values for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.
  2. [12]12. Nichols PD. Sources of long-chain omega-3 oils. Lipid Technol 2004; 16: 247-51.
  3. [39]39. Schwarzer R, Fuchs R. Self efficacy and health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P, eds. Predicting Health Behaviour, 1st ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill Education, 1998; 163-96.
  4. [43]43. Cox DN, Evans G, Lease H. The acceptance of genetically modified oilseeds as sources of long chain omega-3 fatty acids: a conjoint study. Abstract presented at 2006 Australasian Section Meeting of The American Oil Chemists' Society. Food Australia 2007; 59: 135-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, D., Evans, G., & Lease, H.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Cox, DN
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2008-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
8-16
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2116863535
Cited by
39
References
40
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, consumer purchase intention, fish oil supplements, protection motivation theory, self-efficacy, risk perception, novel food acceptance, consumer attitudes, Australian consumers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Coronary Disease, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fishes, Food, Fortified, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, South Australia, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Self Efficacy, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review