Cited by 52Nutritional Studies and DietCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Intakes of fruits, vegetables and carbohydrate and the risk of CVD

Open access
Joshipura, Kaumudi J, Hung, Hsin-Chia, Li, Tricia Y, Hu, Frank B, Rimm, Eric B, Stampfer, Meir J, Colditz, Graham, Willett, Walter C·2009·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Background: Low-carbohydrate diets could lead to reduced fruit and vegetable intake, which may be protective against CVD. The role of carbohydrate intake in modifying the association between fruits and vegetables and CVD has not been evaluated. Objective: To evaluate whether carbohydrate intake affects the association between fruits and vegetables and CVD. Design: We included participants from two large prospective studies, the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals’ Follow-Up Study (HPFS). We followed 70 870 eligible NHS females for 16 years and 38 918 eligible HPFS males for 14 years. Diet was assessed from an FFQ updated every 4 years. Our primary outcome was ischaemic CVD (fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke). We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the relationship between fruits and vegetables and ischaemic CVD within groups with low, moderate or high carbohydrate intake. Results: Fruit intake was strongly related with carbohydrate intake, but vegetables showed a very small correlation. Vegetable intake showed stronger associations with ischaemic CVD among the low carbohydrate group (multivariate risk ratio (RR) = 0·82 for an increment of 3 servings/d; 95 % CI 0·68, 0·99); green leafy vegetables and carotene-rich fruits and vegetables followed a similar pattern. Total fruit intake was associated with a lower risk of ischaemic CVD only among participants with moderate carbohydrate intake (RR = 0·81 comparing extreme quintiles; 95 % CI 0·70, 0·94). Conclusions: Total vegetables, green leafy vegetables and carotene-rich fruits and vegetables showed stronger associations with ischaemic CVD among the low carbohydrate group. No consistent trends were observed for fruit intake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980008002036

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A diet rich in vegetables, which contain high concentrations of inorganic NO3-, significantly protects against coronary heart disease and stroke.

    “Conversely, a diet rich in vegetables, which contain high concentrations of inorganic NO3-, significantly protects against both coronary heart disease and stroke [16], [2], [20].”

    From Nitrate-responsive oral microbiome modulates nitric oxide homeostasis and blood pressure in humans (2018) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Multivariate analyses report a significant association between higher vegetable intake and lower combined ischaemic CVD risk in the low-carbohydrate group. The Abstract also reports earlier findings linking fruit and vegetable intake to lower risks of stroke and CHD. The paper does not attribute these associations to inorganic nitrate, establish a protective causal effect, or report a significant vegetable-specific effect for CHD and stroke separately. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joshipura, K. J., Hung, H.-C., Li, T. Y., Hu, F. B., Rimm, E. B., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G., & Willett, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Meiho University (TW)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Joshipura, Kaumudi J
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2009-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
115-121
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2088488258
Cited by
52
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL035464, HL35464, R01HL034595)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA040356, CA-55075, CA-40356, P01CA087969, P01CA055075)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, carbohydrate intake, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, low-carbohydrate diet, leafy vegetables, dietary change, Nurses' Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diet, Diet Surveys, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Fruit, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Vegetables, Multivariate Analysis, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review