Cited by 77Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition and Health Studies

Fruit and vegetable intake: Issues with definition and measurement

Open access
Roark, Randall A, Niederhauser, Victoria P·2013·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Accurate determination of fruit and vegetable consumption is essential for research that seeks to determine current fruit and vegetable intake patterns, what type and amount of fruit and vegetable consumption is optimal for human health and for evaluating interventions developed to increase such consumption. However, there are many issues that make accurate determination of fruit and vegetable consumption quite difficult. There are many methods used to measure fruit and vegetable intake, but all have limitations. Also, what foods individuals consider to be or to not be fruits or vegetables appear to be quite variable, with such variability often associated with the individual's racial/ethnic background. Researchers and governmental agencies vary with respect to what foods they include and do not include when calculating fruit and vegetable intake. These differences make it difficult to conduct, evaluate and compare studies in this area. The current paper reviews some of the major issues with measuring and determining fruit and vegetable intake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980012000985

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-reported dietary data are subject to measurement error, such that some individuals may over-report perceived healthy foods and under-report perceived unhealthy foods.

    “self-reported dietary data are subject to measurement error, such that some individuals may over-report consumption of perceived healthy foods and under-report consumption of perceived unhealthy foods.[48, 49]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roark, R. A., & Niederhauser, V. P.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Roark, Randall A
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
2-7
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W1995793843
Cited by
77
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
fruit and vegetable intake, dietary assessment, measurement validity, racial and ethnic differences, dietary guidelines, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Diet, Ethnicity, Feeding Behavior, Fruit, Health, Humans, Vegetables, Nutrition Assessment, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review