Cited by 711Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition and Health Studies

Americans Do Not Meet Federal Dietary Recommendations

Open access
Krebs-Smith, Susan M., Guenther, Patricia M., Subar, Amy F., Kirkpatrick, Sharon I., Dodd, Kevin W.·2010·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

A longstanding goal of dietary surveillance has been to estimate the proportion of the population with intakes above or below a target, such as a recommended level of intake. However, until now, statistical methods for assessing the alignment of food intakes with recommendations have been lacking. The purposes of this study were to demonstrate the National Cancer Institute's method of estimating the distribution of usual intake of foods and determine the proportion of the U.S. population who does not meet federal dietary recommendations. Data were obtained from the 2001-2004 NHANES for 16,338 persons, aged 2 y and older. Quantities of foods reported on 24-h recalls were translated into amounts of various food groups using the MyPyramid Equivalents Database. Usual dietary intake distributions were modeled, accounting for sequence effect, weekend/weekday effect, sex, age, poverty income ratio, and race/ethnicity. The majority of the population did not meet recommendations for all of the nutrient-rich food groups, except total grains and meat and beans. Concomitantly, overconsumption of energy from solid fats, added sugars, and alcoholic beverages ("empty calories") was ubiquitous. Over 80% of persons age ≥ 71 y and over 90% of all other sex-age groups had intakes of empty calories that exceeded the discretionary calorie allowances. In conclusion, nearly the entire U.S. population consumes a diet that is not on par with recommendations. These findings add another piece to the rather disturbing picture that is emerging of a nation's diet in crisis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/jn.110.124826

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]3. NRC. Nutrient adequacy. Assessment using food consumption surveys. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1986.
  2. [7]7. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. DRI dietary reference intakes: applications in dietary assessment. A report of the Subcom- mittee on Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes and the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krebs-Smith, S. M., Guenther, P. M., Subar, A. F., Kirkpatrick, S. I., & Dodd, K. W.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Agriculture (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
140
Issue
10
Pages
1832-1838
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112684865
Cited by
711
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 39
FWCI
38.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
dietary recommendations, usual dietary intake, NHANES, empty calories, solid fats, added sugars, alcoholic beverages, order effects, older adults, dietary monitoring
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Animals, Energy Intake, Edible Grain, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet, Ethnicity, Female, Food, Fruit, Humans, Income, Fabaceae, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Sex Factors, United States, Vegetables, Diet Records, Nutrition Policy, National Cancer Institute (U.S.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review