Cited by 27Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A feasibility study of brief group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain in general practice: recruitment, attendance, and patient views

Open access
McCracken, Lance M., Sato, Ayana, Wainwright, David, House, William, Taylor, Gordon J.·2014·Primary Health Care Research & Development

Abstract

Background: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy, may help meet a need for accessible and cost-effective treatments for chronic pain. ACT has a growing evidence base, but has not yet been tested within general practice settings. Aim: The purpose of the present study was to examine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial of ACT in general practice. Methods: A total of 481 potential participants with chronic pain identified from general practice in southwest England were invited into a treatment trial. Subsequently, 102 (21.2%) of those invited were screened, and 73 (71.6%) of those screened were allocated to ACT plus usual care or usual care alone. The ACT treatment included four, four-hour group-based sessions over two weeks. Results: Twenty-six (70.3%) of the patients allocated to ACT attended three or four sessions. Those who received ACT rated it as credible in a short survey, with Mdn rating 7.0 on a 0–10 scale, across five credibility items. During a post-treatment interview considering 12 aspects of the study from invitation to treatment termination, a median of 79.2% of participants rated the aspects ‘acceptable.’ Qualitative data from the interviews showed a mixed picture of patient experiences, revealing possible tensions between patients’ wishes to avoid discomfort and confusion, and treatment methods that explicitly ask patients to, in essence, ‘live with’ some discomfort and confusion. Conclusions: These data suggest that further study of ACT, as a treatment for chronic pain, is feasible in general practice and it may be possible to further optimize the treatment experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1463423613000273

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCracken, L. M., Sato, A., Wainwright, D., House, W., & Taylor, G. J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
McCracken, Lance M.
Venue
Primary Health Care Research & Development
Published
2013-07-19
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
312-323
ISSN
  • 1463-4236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-1128
OpenAlex
W2316500933
Cited by
27
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Primary Health Care Research & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0808-16156)
  • Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic pain, feasibility, general practice, recruitment (clinical trials), treatment attendance, patient acceptability, treatment credibility, patient experience, usual care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cost-Benefit Analysis, England, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Group, Program Evaluation, Patient Selection, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, General Practice, Chronic Pain, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review