Cited by 91Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative and Oncologic CareReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

An open trial of meaning-centered grief therapy: rationale and preliminary evaluation

Open access
Lichtenthal, Wendy G., Catarozoli, Corinne, Masterson, Melissa, Slivjak, Elizabeth, Schofield, Elizabeth, Roberts, Kailey E., Neimeyer, Robert A., Wiener, Lori +4 more·2019·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objective: To determine the preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and effects of Meaning-Centered Grief Therapy (MCGT) for parents who lost a child to cancer. Method: Parents who lost a child to cancer and who were between six months and six years after loss and reporting elevated levels of prolonged grief were enrolled in open trials of MCGT, a manualized, one-on-one cognitive-behavioral-existential intervention that used psychoeducation, experiential exercises, and structured discussion to explore themes related to meaning, identity, purpose, and legacy. Parents completed 16 weekly sessions, 60–90 minutes in length, either in person or through videoconferencing. Parents were administered measures of prolonged grief disorder symptoms, meaning in life, and other assessments of psychological adjustment preintervention, mid-intervention, postintervention, and at three months postintervention. Descriptive data from both the in-person and videoconferencing open trial were pooled. Result: Eight of 11 (72%) enrolled parents started the MCGT intervention, and six of eight (75%) participants completed all 16 sessions. Participants provided positive feedback about MCGT. Results showed postintervention longitudinal improvements in prolonged grief (d = 1.70), sense of meaning (d = 2.11), depression (d = 0.84), hopelessness (d = 1.01), continuing bonds with their child (d = 1.26), posttraumatic growth (ds = 0.29–1.33), positive affect (d = 0.99), and various health-related quality of life domains (d = 0.46–0.71). Most treatment gains were either maintained or increased at the three-month follow-up assessment. Significance of results: Overall, preliminary data suggest that this 16-session, manualized cognitive-behavioral-existential intervention is feasible, acceptable, and associated with transdiagnostic improvements in psychological functioning among parents who have lost a child to cancer. Future research should examine MCGT with a larger sample in a randomized controlled trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951518000925

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most prior interventions targeting psychological outcomes were not informed by psychological insights and proven psychotherapeutic approaches delivered by trained mental health professionals.

    “This may be because most prior interventions, while targeting psychological outcomes, were not informed by psychological insights and proven psychotherapeutic approaches to promote adjustment to stress, grief, and trauma (21-24) delivered by trained mental health professionals.”

    From EMPOWER: A Multi-Site Pilot Trial to Reduce Distress in Surrogate Decision-Makers in the ICU (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Methods (Intervention Description; page unavailable) describes a theory-informed grief therapy, and the Discussion (Future Directions; page unavailable) notes a need for interventions for bereaved parents. Neither passage assesses whether most prior interventions lacked psychological grounding, established psychotherapeutic approaches, or delivery by trained mental health professionals. Searches for those characteristics of prior interventions did not locate a passage making the attributed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lichtenthal WG (in press-b). When those who need it most use it least: Facilitating grief support for those at greatest risk. Grief Matters: The Australian Journal of Grief and Bereavement, 21(1), 27– 31.
  2. Lichtenthal WG, Roberts K, & Shuk E (2011c). Meaning in parents bereaved by cancer: A mixed methods study. Paper presented at the Association of Death Education and Counseling 33rd Annual Conference, Miami, FL.
  3. Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, Goodkin K, … Maciejewski PK (2009b). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med, 6(8), e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121 19652695 PMC2711304 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Reker GT (1992). Manual of the Life Attitude Profile-Revised (LAP-R). Trent University, Peterborough, ON: Student Psychologists Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lichtenthal, W. G., Catarozoli, C., Masterson, M., Slivjak, E., Schofield, E., Roberts, K. E., Neimeyer, R. A., Wiener, L., Prigerson, H. G., Kissane, D. W., Li, Y., & Breitbart, W.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lichtenthal, Wendy G.
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2019-01-26
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
2-12
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W2913322578
Cited by
88
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
11.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002384)
  • National Cancer Institute (R03CA139944, K07CA172216, P30CA008748, T32CA009461, R35CA197730)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
prolonged grief disorder, meaning in life, existential psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, posttraumatic growth, depression, hopelessness, continuing bonds, videoconferencing, treatment feasibility and acceptability, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depression, Female, Grief, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hospice Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review