Cited by 563Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and care

Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy: An Effective Intervention for Improving Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Open access
Breitbart, William, Rosenfeld, Barry, Pessin, Hayley, Applebaum, Allison, Kulikowski, Julia, Lichtenthal, Wendy G.·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To test the efficacy of meaning-centered group psychotherapy (MCGP) to reduce psychological distress and improve spiritual well-being in patients with advanced or terminal cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced cancer (N = 253) were randomly assigned to manualized eight-session interventions of either MCGP or supportive group psychotherapy (SGP). Patients were assessed before and after completing the treatment and 2 months after treatment. The primary outcome measures were spiritual well-being and overall quality of life, with secondary outcome measures assessing depression, hopelessness, desire for hastened death, anxiety, and physical symptom distress. Results: Hierarchical linear models that included a priori covariates and only participants who attended ≥ three sessions indicated a significant group × time interaction for most outcome variables. Specifically, patients receiving MCGP showed significantly greater improvement in spiritual well-being and quality of life and significantly greater reductions in depression, hopelessness, desire for hastened death, and physical symptom distress compared with those receiving SGP. No group differences were observed for changes in anxiety. Analyses that included all patients, regardless of whether they attended any treatment sessions (ie, intent-to-treat analyses), and no covariates still showed significant treatment effects (ie, greater benefit for patients receiving MCGP v SGP) for quality of life, depression, and hopelessness but not for other outcome variables. Conclusion: This large randomized controlled study provides strong support for the efficacy of MCGP as a treatment for psychological and existential or spiritual distress in patients with advanced cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.57.2198

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Pessin, H., Applebaum, A., Kulikowski, J., & Lichtenthal, W. G.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-03-01
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
749-754
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2166928505
Cited by
563
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 17 · 2013: 1
FWCI
62.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA128187, K07CA172216, CA128187, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
advanced cancer, terminal cancer, spiritual well-being, psychological distress, quality of life, depression, hopelessness, physical symptom distress, existential suffering, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Outpatients, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Spirituality, Hope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review