Cited by 31Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The effectiveness of compassion-based interventions among cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Fan, Ya-Chi, Hsiao, Fei-Hsiu, Hsieh, Chia-Chen·2023·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the effects of compassion-based intervention on mental health in cancer patients by using systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Eleven bibliographic databases were searched from their earliest data available date up to March 1, 2022. The databases were PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, WOS, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations, Airiti Library, and the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. Results: Ten studies from 2015 to 2021 were included with a total of 771 cancer patients. Most were targeted at women with breast cancer. Brief compassion-based interventions of approximately 30 minutes were conducted by audio file, paper, and web-based self-guided writing prompts. Most were conducted after the completion of active treatment. Anxiety was the most measured outcome. Constructive compassion-based interventions with 4- to 12-week sessions were conducted by a trained facilitator. Most were conducted for patients who had undergone treatment, and depression was the most measured outcome. The meta-analysis indicated that compassion-based interventions had a significant effect of reducing depression and increasing self-compassion. Moderation analysis indicated that constructive intervention showed more benefits of increased self-compassion than brief intervention. Both face-to-face and non-face-to-face web-delivered formats had benefits for increasing self-compassion compared with the control condition. Significance of results: Compassion-based interventions might provide an effective strategy for improving self-compassion and depression among patients with breast cancer. Suggestions for further research and health-care providers follow.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951522001316

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are existing systematic and metareviews on web-based interventions for cancer care/aftercare and on fear of cancer recurrence interventions more generally.

    “There are a number of existing systematic and metareviews on web-based interventions for cancer care/aftercare [9–17] and on fear of cancer recurrence interventions more generally [18–21].”

    From Web-based interventions for fear of cancer recurrence: A scoping review with a focus on suggestions for the development and evaluation of future interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Design section identifies this paper as a systematic review and meta-analysis, and ‘The effectiveness of mindfulness and cancer-related outcomes’ section reports fear-of-recurrence outcomes from two included studies. But the review covers compassion-based interventions for cancer patients, not fear-of-cancer-recurrence interventions generally. The web-based-intervention clause has a separate citation range and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ash M, Harrison T, Pinto M, et al. (2021) A model for cognitively-based compassion training: Theoretical underpinnings and proposed mechanisms. Social Theory & Health 19(1), 43-67. doi:10.1057/s41285-019-00124-x · DOI
  2. Bender R, Friede T, Koch A, et al. (2018) Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies. Research Synthesis Methods 9(3), 382-392. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1297 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bown MJ and Sutton AJ (2010) Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 40(5), 669-677. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.011 · DOI
  4. Brandenbarg D, Maass SWMC, Geerse OP, et al. (2019) A systematic review on the prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety and distress in long- term cancer survivors: Implications for primary care. European Journal of Cancer Care 28(3), e13086. doi:10.1111/ecc.13086 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brooker J, Julian J, Millar J, et al. (2020) A feasibility and acceptability study of an adaptation of the mindful self-compassion program for adult cancer patients. Palliative & Supportive Care 18(2), 130-140. doi:10.1017/ S1478951519000737 · DOI
  6. Campos RC, Besser A, Ferreira R, et al. (2012) Self-criticism, neediness, and distress among women undergoing treatment for breast cancer: A prelimi- nary test of the moderating role of adjustment to illness. International Journal of Stress Management 19(2), 151-174. doi:10.1037/a0027996 Card NA (2012) Applied Meta-analysis for Social Science Research. New York: Guilford. · DOI
  7. Cheung EO, Cohn MA, Dunn LB, et al. (2017) A randomized pilot trial of a positive affect skill intervention (lessons in linking affect and coping) for women with metastatic breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 26(12), 2101-2108. doi:10.1002/pon.4312 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dodds SE, Pace TWW, Bell ML, et al. (2015) Feasibility of Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT) for breast cancer survivors: A randomized, wait list controlled pilot study. Supportive Care in Cancer 23 (12), 3599-3608.
  9. Gilbert P (2014) The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 53(1), 6-41. doi:10.1111/bjc.12043 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hedges LV and Olkin I (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  11. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. (2019) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edn. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. (2003) Measuring inconsis- tency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414), 557-560. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.74 14.557 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Jazaieri H, Jinpa GT, McGonigal K, et al. (2013) Enhancing compassion: A randomized controlled trial of a compassion cultivation training pro- gram. Journal of Happiness Studies 14(4), 1113-1126. doi:10.1007/s10902- 012-9373-z · DOI
  14. Kirby JN (2017) Compassion interventions: The programmes, the evidence, and implications for research and practice. Psychology and Psychotherapy 90(3), 432-455. doi:10.1111/papt.12104 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Latifi Z, Soltani M and Mousavi S (2020) Evaluation of the effectiveness of self-healing training on self-compassion, body image concern, and recov- ery process in patients with skin cancer. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 40, 101180. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101180 · DOI
  16. Mifsud A, Pehlivan MJ, Fam P, et al. (2021) Feasibility and pilot study of a brief self-compassion intervention addressing body image distress in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychology & Behavioral Medicine 9(1), 498-526. doi:10.1080/21642850.2021.1929236 · DOI
  17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 state- ment: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Pinto-Gouveia J, Duarte C, Matos M, et al. (2014) The protective role of self- compassion in relation to psychopathology symptoms and quality of life in chronic and in cancer patients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 21(4), 311-323. doi:10.1002/cpp.1838 · DOI
  19. Przezdziecki A and Sherman KA (2016) Modifying affective and cognitive responses regarding body image difficulties in breast cancer survivors using a self-compassion-based writing intervention. Mindfulness 7(5), 1142-1155. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0557-1 · DOI
  20. Sherman KA, Przezdziecki A, Alcorso J, et al. (2018) Reducing body image- related distress in women with breast cancer using a structured online writing exercise: Results from the my changed body randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 36 (19), 1930-1940. 10.1200/JCO.2017. 76.3318. · DOI
  21. Sotirova MB, McCaughan EM, Ramsey L, et al. (2021) Acceptability of online exercise-based interventions after breast cancer surgery: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 15(2), 281-310. doi:10.1007/s11764-020-00931-6 · DOI
  22. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 can- cers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 71(3), 209-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Walker J, Magill N, Mulick A, et al. (2020) Different independent associa- tions of depression and anxiety with survival in patients with cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 138, 110218. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020. 110218 · DOI
  24. Wren AA, Shelby RA, Soo MS, et al. (2019) Preliminary efficacy of a lov- ingkindness meditation intervention for patients undergoing biopsy and breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled pilot study. Supportive Care in Cancer : Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 27(9), 3583-3592. doi:10.1007/s00520-019-4657-z · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, Y.-C., Hsiao, F.-H., & Hsieh, C.-C.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hsieh, Chia-Chen
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2022-11-18
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
534-546
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W4309360780
Cited by
31
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology (108-2926-I-002-002-MY4)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
compassion-based interventions, cancer patients, breast cancer, self-compassion, depression, anxiety, mental health
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Breast Neoplasms, Empathy, Female, Humans, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review