The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review
Open accessAbstract
Concerns about the environmental effect and the economic burden of methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants are driving the search for ways to mitigate rumen methanogenesis. The use of direct-fed microbials (DFM) is one possible option to decrease CH4 emission from ruminants. Direct-fed microbials are already used in ruminants mainly to increase productivity and to improve health, and are readily accepted by producers and consumers alike. However, studies on the use of DFM as rumen CH4 mitigants are scarce. A few studies using Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown a CH4-decreasing effect but, to date, there has not been a systematic exploration of DFM as modulators of rumen methanogenesis. In this review, we explored biochemical pathways competing with methanogenesis that, potentially, could be modulated by the use of DFM. Pathways involving the redirection of H2 away from methanogenesis and pathways producing less H2 during feed fermentation are the preferred options. Propionate formation is an example of the latter option that in addition to decrease CH4 formation increases the retention of energy from the diet. Homoacetogenesis is a pathway using H2 to produce acetate, however up to now no acetogen has been shown to efficiently compete with methanogens in the rumen. Nitrate and sulphate reduction are pathways competing with methanogenesis, but the availability of these substances in the rumen is limited. Although there were studies using nitrate and sulphate as chemical additives, use of DFM for improving these processes and decrease the accumulation of toxic metabolites needs to be explored more. There are some other pathways such as methanotrophy and capnophily or modes of action such as inhibition of methanogens that theoretically could be provided by DFM and affect methanogenesis. We conclude that DFM is a promising alternative for rumen methane mitigation that should be further explored for their practical usage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feeding live microorganisms to ruminants is not a novel concept and extensive work has been published on the use of “direct-fed microbials” (DFM; Martin and Nisbet, 1992; Jeyanathan et al., 2014).”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Jeyanathan et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006) · Agritrop (Cirad) · Cited by 4,383
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
IPCC--Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Fu, Q., Manabe, S., & Johanson, C. M. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5008 · Cited by 3,303
Hobson, P. N., & Stewart, C. S. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7 · Cited by 2,159
Acetogenesis and the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway of CO2 fixation
Ragsdale, S. W., & Pierce, E. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.08.012 · Cited by 1,409 · cited 1×
“In addition, acetogens can grow heterotrophically by utilising sugars and other substrates (e.g. alcohols, organic acids; Ragsdale and Pierce, 2008).”
BackgroundMethane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale
Martin, C., Morgavi, D., & Doreau, M. (2009) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731109990620 · Cited by 938 · cited 2×
“emission compel researchers to look for ways to decrease rumen methanogenesis (Martin et al., 2010; Buddle et al., 2011).”
Diversity and Distribution of Methanotrophic Archaea at Cold Seeps
Knittel, K., Lösekann, T., Boëtius, A., Kort, R., & Amann, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.1.467-479.2005 · Cited by 661
Structure of the Archaeal Community of the Rumen
Janssen, P. H., & Kirs, M. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02812-07 · Cited by 655
Denitrification: ecological niches, competition and survival
Tiedje, J. M., Sexstone, A. J., Myrold, D. D., & Robinson, J. A. (1983) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/bf00399542 · Cited by 626 · cited 1×
“The presence of more organic carbon in the soil is thought to be the reason for this high denitri fi cation activity (Tiedje et al., 1982).”
BackgroundDridi, B., Fardeau, M.-L., Ollivier, B., Raoult, D., & Drancourt, M. (2012) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.033712-0 · Cited by 596
McGinn, S. M., Beauchemin, K. A., Coates, T., & Colombatto, D. (2004) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2004.82113346x · Cited by 477
Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future
Chaucheyras‐Durand, F., Walker, N. D., & Bach, À. (2007) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019 · Cited by 477 · cited 2×
“Chaucheyras-Durand et al. (2008) in their review identi fi ed three main effects of yeast on rumen development: improvement of rumen maturity by favouring microbial establishment, stabilising rumen pH and increasing fi bre degradation.”
Bryant, M. P., Campbell, L. L., Reddy, C. A., & Crabill, M. R. (1977) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.33.5.1162-1169.1977 · Cited by 458
Enzymology and bioenergetics of respiratory nitrite ammonification
Simon, J. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00616.x · Cited by 403 · cited 1×
“However, physiological similarities between W.succinogenes and NR-SOB Sulphurospirillium deleyianum, suggest that this function is present in the rumen (Simon, 2002).”
BackgroundManipulation of ruminal fermentation
Nagaraja, T. G., Newbold, C. J., Nevel, C. J. V., & Demeyer, D. I. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_13 · Cited by 401 · cited 1×
“However, biohydrogenation accounts only for 1% to 2% of the H2 consumed (Nagaraja et al., 1997).”
Hallam, S., Girguis, P. R., Preston, C. M., Richardson, P. M., & DeLong, E. F. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.9.5483-5491.2003 · Cited by 385
Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performance response and mode of action
Krehbiel, C. R., Rust, S. R., Zhang, G., & Gilliland, S. E. (2003) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2003.8114_suppl_2e120x · Cited by 364 · cited 1×
“Direct-fed microbials have been defined as a ‘source of live, naturally occurring microorganisms’ (Krehbiel et al., 2003) and, they have been successfully used in ruminant production to increase productivity, to prevent digestive disorders like acidosis and to decrease pathogenic load in young animals (Adams et al.”
Miller, T. L., & Wolin, M. J. (1985) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00423270 · Cited by 362 · cited 1×
“For example, methanogens belonging to the genus Methanosphaera absolutely require methanol (Miller and Wolin, 1985) while genus Methanomicrococcus require methanol or methylamine (Sprenger et al., 2000) for their growth.”
BackgroundMode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants
Newbold, C. J., Wallace, R. J., & Mcintosh, F. M. (1996) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19960029 · Cited by 347
Paul, K., Nonoh, J. O., Mikulski, L., & Brune, A. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02193-12 · Cited by 346 · cited 1×
“Recent reports on a human methanogen isolate and on termite gut enrichment cultures suggested that methanol may be an obligatory requirement for rumen cluster C group (Dridi et al., 2012; Paul et al., 2012).”
van Zijderveld, S. M., Gerrits, W. J. J., Apajalahti, J., Newbold, J. R., Dijkstra, J., Leng, R. A., & Perdok, H. B. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3281 · Cited by 326 · cited 3×
“However, there were only few studies on effect of sulphate supplementation in rumen methanogenesis (Morvan et al., 1996; van Zijderveld et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialHubert, C. R. J., & Voordouw, G. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02332-06 · Cited by 316 · cited 2×
“In anaerobic environments, H 2 S can act as an electron donor for nitrite ammoni fi cation in nitrate-reducing-sulphide-oxidising bacteria (NR-SOB) (Garcia-de-Lomas etal., 2007; Hubert and Voordouw, 2007).”
BackgroundNutritional requirements of the predominant rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
Bryant, M. P. (1973) · PubMed · Cited by 280
Counotte, G. H. M., Prins, R. A., Janssen, R. H. A. M., & deBie, M. J. A. (1981) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.42.4.649-655.1981 · Cited by 276 · cited 1×
“) but in vitro (Counotte et al., 1981) and in vivo (Klieve et al.”
Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows
van Zijderveld, S. M., Gerrits, W. J. J., Dijkstra, J., Newbold, J. R., Hulshof, R. B. A., & Perdok, H. B. (2011) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4236 · Cited by 265
Pathway of Succinate and Propionate Formation in Bacteroides fragilis
Macy, J. M., Ljungdahl, L. G., & Gottschalk, G. (1978) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.134.1.84-91.1978 · Cited by 263 · cited 1×
“Indeed, W. succinogenes can grow using sulphide as an electron donor and fumarate as an electron acceptor (Macy et al., 1978).”
BackgroundReview: The use of direct fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and enhance production in cattle
McAllister, T. A., Beauchemin, K. A., Alazzeh, A. Y., Baah, J., Teather, R. M., & Stanford, K. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas10047 · Cited by 251
Direct-fed Microbials for Ruminant Animals
Seo, J. K., Kim, S.-W., Kim, M. H., Upadhaya, S. D., Kam, D.-K., & Ha, J. K. (2010) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2010.r.08 · Cited by 249 · cited 1×
“Propionate formation is the main rumen biochemical pathway explored and exploited by bacterial DFM in ruminant production (Seo et al., 2010).”
Klieve, A. V., Hennessy, D., Ouwerkerk, D., Forster, R. J., Mackie, R. I., & Attwood, G. T. (2003) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02024.x · Cited by 248
Hou, S., Makarova, K. S., Saw, J. H. W., Senin, P., Ly, B. V., Zhou, Z., Ren, Y., Wang, J., Galperin, M. Y., Omelchenko, M. V., et al. (2008) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-3-26 · Cited by 238 · cited 1×
“Although their role in the rumen is not well understood, some members of the Verrucomicrobia have been found to oxidise CH 4 as the sole source of carbon and energy in non-rumen environments (Hou et al., 2008).”
Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen
Whitford, M. F., Teather, R. M., & Forster, R. J. (2001) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-1-5 · Cited by 231 · cited 2×
“Methanomicrococcus and Methanosarcina were also retrieved from several rumen clone libraries (Whitford et al., 2001; Sundset et al., 2009), but not in signi fi cant numbers.”
Sulphate reducing bacteria and hydrogen metabolism in the human large intestine.
Gibson, G. R., Macfarlane, G. T., & Cummings, J. H. (1993) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.34.4.437 · Cited by 226 · cited 1×
“As the energetic of sulphate reduction is slightly more favourable than methanogenesis (−152 kJ v. −131 kJ/mol; Gibson et al., 1993), encouraging competition between these two groups theoretically decreases methanogenesis.”
Ghorbani, G. R., Morgavi, D., Beauchemin, K. A., & Leedle, J. A. Z. (2002) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2002.8071977x · Cited by 226 · cited 1×
“were used to increase animal productivity (Ghorbani et al., 2002; Adams et al., 2008), M.”
Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae Implicated in Low Methane Emissions from Tammar Wallabies
Pope, P. B., Smith, W. J. M., Denman, S. E., Tringe, S. G., Barry, K., Hugenholtz, P., McSweeney, C. S., McHardy, A. C., & Morrison, M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205760 · Cited by 225 · cited 1×
“A member from this group was isolated and the genome sequence of this isolate proved that it is a capnophile dependent on CO 2 to support its metabolism via succinate biosynthesis (Pope et al., 2011).”
BackgroundFormate as an Intermediate in the Bovine Rumen Fermentation
Hungate, R. E., Smith, W. W., Bauchop, T., Yu, I. K., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1970) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.102.2.389-397.1970 · Cited by 225 · cited 1×
“Formate is an important substrate used by rumen methanogens (Hungate et al., 1970).”
Comparative analyses of foregut and hindgut bacterial communities in hoatzins and cows
Godoy‐Vitorino, F., Goldfarb, K. C., Karaöz, U., Leal, S. J., García-Amado, M. A., Hugenholtz, P., Tringe, S. G., Brodie, E., & Domínguez-Bello, M. G. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.131 · Cited by 209
Acetate Synthesis from H 2 plus CO 2 by Termite Gut Microbes
Breznak, J. A., & Switzer, J. M. (1986) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.52.4.623-630.1986 · Cited by 207 · cited 1×
“Homoacetogenesis is competitive to methanogenesis in the gut microbial ecosystem of humans, rodents, macropods, and wood-digesting termites (Breznak and Switzer, 1986).”
Classification of the spore-forming sulfate-reducing bacteria
Campbell, L. L., & Postgate, J. R. (1965) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.29.3.359-363.1965 · Cited by 195
Energy-yielding and energy-consuming reactions
Russell, J. B., & Wallace, R. J. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_6 · Cited by 190 · cited 2×
“elsdenii is the major rumen bacteria involved in this pathway (Russell and Wallace, 1997), which requires the presence of lactate.”
Strategies to reduce methane emissions from farmed ruminants grazing on pasture
Buddle, B. M., Denis, M., Attwood, G. T., Altermann, E., Janssen, P. H., Ronimus, R. S., Pinares-Patiño, C. S., Muetzel, S., & Wedlock, D. N. (2010) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.02.019 · Cited by 187 · cited 2×
“emission compel researchers to look for ways to decrease rumen methanogenesis (Martin et al., 2010; Buddle et al., 2011).”
Methane oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea
Hyman, M. R., & Wood, P. M. (1983) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2120031 · Cited by 186 · cited 2×
“Members of the genus Nitrosomonas are ammoniaoxidising bacteria, which have the ability to oxidise CH4 under some conditions (Hyman and Wood, 1983; Jiang and Bakken, 1999).”
Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaea in the forestomach of the alpaca (Vicugna pacos)
St‐Pierre, B., & Wright, A. G. (2012) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-12-1 · Cited by 175
Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces methane emission in beef cattle fed sugarcane-based diets1
Hulshof, R. B. A., Berndt, A., Gerrits, W. J. J., Dijkstra, J., van Zijderveld, S. M., Newbold, J. R., & Perdok, H. B. (2012) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4209 · Cited by 162
Lynch, H. A., & Martin, S. A. (2002) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74345-2 · Cited by 155
Lila, Z. A., Mohammed, N., Yasui, T., Kurokawa, Y., KANDA, S., & Itabashi, H. (2004) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2004.8261847x · Cited by 145
Isolation and Identification of Ruminal Methanogens from Grazing Cattle
Jarvis, G. N., Strömpl, C., Burgess, D. M., Skillman, L. C., Moore, E. R. B., & Joblin, K. N. (2000) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s002849910065 · Cited by 143
Mutsvangwa, T., Edwards, I. E., Topps, J. H., & Paterson, G. F. M. (1992) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s0003356100037247 · Cited by 138
Nitrous Oxide Production and Methane Oxidation by Different Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria
Jiang, Q.-Q., & Bakken, L. R. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.6.2679-2684.1999 · Cited by 136
Nollet, L. M. L., Demeyer, D., & Verstraete, W. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.1.194-200.1997 · Cited by 134 · cited 2×
“Peptostreptococcusproductus, an acetogen isolated from an anaerobic sludge digester promoted acetogenesisinvitroonly when methanogenesis was selectively inhibited (Nollet et al., 1997 and 1998).”
BackgroundEstablishment of hydrogen-utilizing bacteria in the rumen of the newborn lamb
Morvan, B., Dore, J. M., Rieu-Lesme, F., Foucat, L. ̄., Fonty, G., & Gouet, P. (1994) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06775.x · Cited by 134
Jeyanathan, J., Kirs, M., Ronimus, R. S., Hoskin, S. O., & Janssen, P. H. (2011) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01056.x · Cited by 132 · cited 2×
“are common inhabitants of the rumen and found to be an important group in forage-fed cow, sheep and red deer (Jeyanathan et al., 2011).”
Cheng, K.-J., & Wallace, R. J. (1979) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19790147 · Cited by 132 · cited 1×
“Close to the rumen wall there is always ammonia as urea coming from blood, which is rapidly degraded by ureolytic bacteria attached to the rumen wall (Cheng and Wallace, 1979).”
BackgroundGagen, E. J., Denman, S. E., Padmanabha, J., Zadbuke, S., Jassim, R. A. M. A., Morrison, M., & McSweeney, C. S. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01679-10 · Cited by 129 · cited 1×
“The homoacetogen population in Tammar wallaby forestomach is different compared with that found in ruminants (Gagen et al., 2010), which can be one of the reasons for lower CH 4 emission.”
BackgroundChung, Y.-H., Walker, N. D., McGinn, S. M., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2011) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3277 · Cited by 128
Chaucheyras, F., Fonty, G., Bertin, G., & Gouet, P. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.9.3466-3467.1995 · Cited by 127
The Effect of Nisin and Monensin on Ruminal Fermentations In Vitro
Callaway, T. R., & Melo, A. M. S. C. D. (1997) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s002849900218 · Cited by 126 · cited 1×
“In vitro experiments have shown that nisin suppresses methanogenesis as much as 20% without negative impact on VFA production (Callaway et al., 1997; Sar et al., 2005a).”
Kaspar, H. F., & Tiedje, J. M. (1981) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.41.3.705-709.1981 · Cited by 120
Mathieu, F., Jouany, J., Sénaud, J., Bohatier, J., Bertin, G., & Mercier, M. (1996) · Reproduction Nutrition Development · doi:10.1051/rnd:19960305 · Cited by 119
Establishment and Development of Ruminal Hydrogenotrophs in Methanogen-Free Lambs
Fonty, G., Joblin, K. N., Chavarot, M., Roux, R., Naylor, G. E., & Michallon, F. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00181-07 · Cited by 115 · cited 1×
“Homoacetogens have been shown to sustain a functional rumen in methanogen-free lambs (Fonty et al., 2007) and studies have already shown that by inhibiting methanogenesis, the acetogenesis can be stimulated (Boccazzi and Patterson, 1996; Nollet et al., 1997).”
BackgroundEffect of adding acetogenic bacteria on methane production by mixed rumen microorganisms
López, S., McIntosh, F. M., Wallace, R. J., & Newbold, C. J. (1999) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(98)00273-9 · Cited by 112 · cited 1×
“Methanol can also be utilised by homoacetogens (Lopez et al., 1999).”
Sprenger, W. W., van Belzen, M. C., Rosenberg, J., Hackstein, J. H. P., & Keltjens, J. T. (2000) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · doi:10.1099/00207713-50-6-1989 · Cited by 112 · cited 1×
“For example, methanogens belonging to the genus Methanosphaera absolutely require methanol (Miller and Wolin, 1985) while genus Methanomicrococcus require methanol or methylamine (Sprenger et al., 2000) for their growth.”
Mwenya, B., Santoso, B., Sar, C., Gamo, Y., Kobayashi, T., Arai, I., & Takahashi, J. (2004) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.03.007 · Cited by 110
Wright, A. G., Toovey, A. F., & Pimm, C. L. (2006) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2006.02.002 · Cited by 109 · cited 1×
“Instead, the rumen cluster C group is one of the major methanogen groups (Janssen and Kirs, 2008) sometimes contributing up to 80% of the total clones analysed (Wright et al., 2006).”
BackgroundCarro, M. D., Lebzien, P., & Rohr, K. B. (1992) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(92)90005-q · Cited by 107
Lettat, A., Nozière, P., Silberberg, M., Morgavi, D., Berger, C., & Martin, C. (2012) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-12-142 · Cited by 107 · cited 4×
“Decrease in CH 4 emission was recently observed in lactating dairy cows receiving a mixed Propionibacterium jensenii – Lactobacillus spp. DFM (Lettat et al., 2012a) showing the potential of this approach to mitigate rumen CH 4 emission.”
InfluentialMolecular Diversity of the Rumen Microbiome of Norwegian Reindeer on Natural Summer Pasture
Sundset, M. A., Edwards, J. E., Cheng, Y. F., Senosiain, R. S., Fraile, M. N., Northwood, K. S., Præsteng, K. E., Glad, T., Mathiesen, S. D., & Wright, A. G. (2008) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-008-9414-7 · Cited by 106 · cited 2×
“Methanomicrococcus and Methanosarcina were also retrieved from several rumen clone libraries (Whitford et al., 2001; Sundset et al., 2009), but not in signi fi cant numbers.”
Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Culture on Nutrient Digestion in Lactating Dairy Cows
Doreau, M. M., & Jouany, J. P. (1998) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75885-0 · Cited by 96
Hino, T., Shimada, K., & Maruyama, T. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.6.1827-1831.1994 · Cited by 94 · cited 1×
“elsdenii utilise glucose and produce acetate and butyrate but not propionate (Hino et al., 1994).”
Selection of a novel direct-fed microbial to enhance weight gain in intensively reared calves
Adams, M. C., Luo, J., RAYWARD, D. H., King, S., Gibson, R. E., & Moghaddam, G. (2007) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.035 · Cited by 94 · cited 2×
“were used to increase animal productivity (Ghorbani et al., 2002; Adams et al., 2008), M.”
Aikman, P. C., Henning, P. H., Humphries, D. J., & Horn, C. H. (2011) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3783 · Cited by 94 · cited 2×
“were used to prevent rumen acidosis in concentrate-fed animals (Aikman et al., 2011; Lettat et al., 2012b) and Lactobacillus spp.”
García‐de‐Lomas, J., Corzo, A., Portillo, M. C., Grau, J. M. G., Andrades, J. A., Sáiz‐Jiménez, C., & García‐Robledo, E. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.004 · Cited by 86
Nitrite reduction to nitrous oxide by propionibacteria: Detoxication mechanism
Kaspar, H. F. (1982) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00413525 · Cited by 85
Lee, S. S., Hsu, J., Mantovani, H. C., & Russell, J. B. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11455.x · Cited by 80 · cited 1×
“However, nisin is susceptible to rumen proteases (Lee et al., 2002a) limiting its utilisation in vivo.”
BackgroundLi, M., Zhou, M., Adamowicz, E. M., Basarab, J. A., & Guan, L. L. (2011) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.08.007 · Cited by 78
Iwamoto, M., Asanuma, N., & Hino, T. (2002) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1006/anae.2002.0428 · Cited by 76
Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Culture on In Vitro Mixed Ruminal Microorganism Fermentation
Sullivan, H. M., & Martin, S. A. (1999) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75438-x · Cited by 75
Li, L., Davis, J., Nolan, J. V., & Hegarty, R. S. (2012) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an11254 · Cited by 75
Carbon Dioxide Requirement of Various Species of Rumen Bacteria
Dehority, B. A. (1971) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.105.1.70-76.1971 · Cited by 73 · cited 1×
“Dehority (1971) suggested two types of CO 2 requirement among rumen bacteria: biosynthesis type in which CO 2 is required for cell growth (e.g. S.bovis) and the second type includes bacteria that are forming succinate in addition to biosynthesis (e.g. Actinobacillussuccinogenes, Mannheimia…”
Methane Production and Digestibility Measurements in the Grey Kangaroo and Sheep
Kempton, T., Murray, R., & Leng, R. A. (1976) · Australian Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.1071/bi9760209 · Cited by 73
Denitrification in Suburban Lawn Soils
Raciti, S. M., Burgin, A. J., Groffman, P. M., Lewis, D. N., & Fahey, T. J. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0107 · Cited by 69 · cited 1×
“Denitri fi cation is prominent in the soil ecosystem (McKenney etal., 1982; Raciti et al., 2011).”
BackgroundCONVERSION OF GLUCOSE-C 14 TO PROPIONATE BY THE RUMEN MICROBIOTA
Baldwin, R. L., Wood, W. A., & Emery, R. S. (1963) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.85.6.1346-1349.1963 · Cited by 66 · cited 1×
“Propionate formation consumes reducing equivalents, pyruvate is reduced to propionate, therefore it is considered as H 2 -utilisation pathway, while in H 2 formation, protons (H + ) are reduced to H 2 (Baldwin et al., 1963).”
BackgroundLeedle, J. A. Z., & Greening, R. C. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.2.502-506.1988 · Cited by 65 · cited 1×
“The population of homoacetogens in the rumen highly varies (undetectable to 10 7 cells/ml) depending on diet, age of the animal and time of sampling (Leedle and Greening, 1988; Fonty etal., 2007).”
BackgroundSulfate Reduction by a Desulfovibrio Species Isolated from Sheep Rumen
Huisingh, J. L., McNeill, J. J., & Matrone, G. (1974) · Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1128/am.28.3.489-497.1974 · Cited by 64
Henning, P. H., Horn, C. H., Leeuw, K.-J., Meissner, H. H., & Hagg, F. M. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.02.002 · Cited by 63 · cited 1×
“It has been shown that in cows supplemented with a M.elsdeniiDFM, the pattern of rumen fermentation was altered in favour of propionate with potential bene fi ts on energy balance and animal productivity (Henning et al., 2010; Aikman etal., 2011).”
BackgroundProduction and Loss of Nitric Oxide from Denitrification in Anaerobic Brookston Clay
McKenney, D. J., Shuttleworth, K. F., Vriesacker, J. R., & Findlay, W. I. (1982) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.43.3.534-541.1982 · Cited by 62
Romero‐Pérez, G. A., Ominski, K., McAllister, T. A., & Krause, D. O. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01289-09 · Cited by 62
Detection of Proteobacteria from the rumen by PCR using methanotroph-specific primers
Mitsumori, M., AJISAKA, N., Tajima, K., Kajikawa, H., & KURIHARA, M. (2002) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01172.x · Cited by 60 · cited 1×
“In another study bacterial clones closely related to Nitrosomonas spp. were identi fi ed from a clone library constructed from samples of bacterial communities attached to the rumen epithelium (Mitsumori et al., 2002).”
BackgroundChaucheyras‐Durand, F., Masseglia, S., Fonty, G., & Forano, É. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01784-10 · Cited by 60
Nollet, L. M. L., Mbanzamihigo, L., Demeyer, D. I., & Verstraete, W. (1998) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00135-1 · Cited by 56 · cited 1×
“The spent media of L.plantarumdecreased methanogenesis by 18% in vitro (Nollet et al., 1998) while compounds produced by another L. plantarum strain decreased methanogenesis by 90% (Asa etal., 2010).”
BackgroundUse of a novel nitrotoxin-metabolizing bacterium to reduce ruminal methane production
Anderson, R. C., & Rasmussen, M. A. (1998) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(97)00184-3 · Cited by 56 · cited 2×
“In an in vitro trial, Anderson and Rasmussen (1998) inoculated the nitrate-reducing rumen bacterium Denitrobacteriumdetoxi fi cans strain NPOH1 along with added nitrate (10 μ mol/ml) and observed up to 95% decrease in the CH 4 production without nitrite accumulation.”
EFFECT OF ACCLIMATION TO HIGH NITRATE INTAKES ON SOME RUMEN FERMENTATION PARAMETERS IN SHEEP
Alaboudi, A. R., & JONES, G. A. (1985) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas85-099 · Cited by 56 · cited 2×
“solutions were proposed to avoid this problem (Alaboudi and Jones, 1985; Takahashi and Young, 1991; van Zijderveld et al., 2010).”
Morvan, B., Rieu-Lesme, F., Fonty, G., & Gouet, P. (1996) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1006/anae.1996.0023 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“However, there were only few studies on effect of sulphate supplementation in rumen methanogenesis (Morvan et al., 1996; van Zijderveld et al., 2010).”
Cummings, B. A., Gould, D. H., Caldwell, D. R., & Hamar, D. W. (1995) · American Journal of Veterinary Research · doi:10.2460/ajvr.1995.56.10.1390 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“Instead their sulphate reducing capacity was enhanced (Cummings et al., 1995).”
BackgroundSar, C., Mwenya, B., Santoso, B., Takaura, K., Morikawa, R., Isogai, N., Asakura, Y., TORIDE, Y., & Takahashi, J. (2005) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2005.833644x · Cited by 52
Pathway of propionate formation in Bacteroides ruminicola
Wallnöfer, P. R., & Baldwin, R. L. (1967) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.93.1.504-505.1967 · Cited by 51 · cited 1×
“Some strains of the rumen bacterium Prevotella ruminicola can also form propionate via the acrylate pathway, but the amount of propionate formed by these strains is not signi fi cant in the rumen (Wallnofer and Baldwin, 1967).”
BackgroundSadet-Bourgeteau, S., Martin, C., & Morgavi, D. P. (2010) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.029 · Cited by 51 · cited 2×
“However, their presence in the rumen epithelium was not always observed suggesting that they are minor or occasional members (Sadet-Bourgeteau et al., 2010; Li etal., 2011).”
Takahashi, J., & Young, B. A. (1991) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(91)90103-y · Cited by 49 · cited 2×
“solutions were proposed to avoid this problem (Alaboudi and Jones, 1985; Takahashi and Young, 1991; van Zijderveld et al., 2010).”
Franzolin, R., St‐Pierre, B., Northwood, K. S., & Wright, A. G. (2012) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-012-0007-0 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“Although they are categorised as a minor group based on the meta-analysis of partial 16S rRNA sequences by Janssen and Kirs (2008), recent studies showed that they are ubiquitous members of the rumen in different ruminant species, fed different diets and at various geographical locations (Franzolin et al., 2012; St-Pi…”
Gagen, E. J., Mosoni, P., Denman, S. E., Jassim, R. A. M. A., McSweeney, C. S., & Forano, É. (2012) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-012-0024-z · Cited by 43
Sar, C., Mwenya, B., Pen, B., Takaura, K., Morikawa, R., Tsujimoto, A., Kuwaki, K., Isogai, N., Shinzato, I., Asakura, Y., et al. (2005) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20051517 · Cited by 43
Dröge, S., Limper, U., Emtiazi, F., Schonig, I., Pavlus, N., Drzyzga, O., Fischer, U., & König, H. (2005) · The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.2323/jgam.51.57 · Cited by 43
Iwamoto, M., Asanuma, N., & Hino, T. (1999) · Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho · doi:10.2508/chikusan.70.471 · Cited by 38
Ellis, J. E., McIntyre, P. S., Saleh, M., Williams, A. G., & Lloyd, D. (1991) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.57.5.1400-1407.1991 · Cited by 37
Sakthivel, P. C., Kamra, D. N., Agarwal, N., & Chaudhary, L. C. (2012) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2011.11383 · Cited by 37
Methane oxidation and its coupled electron-sink reactions in ruminal fluid
Kajikawa, H., Valdés, C., Hillman, K., Wallace, R. J., & Newbold, C. J. (2003) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01317.x · Cited by 37
Effect of ruminal cellulolytic bacterial concentrations on in situ digestion of forage cellulose.
Dehority, B. A., & Tirabasso, P. A. (1998) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1998.76112905x · Cited by 37
Prophylactic effect of L-cysteine to acute and subclinical nitrate toxicity in sheep
Takahashi, J., Ikeda, M., MATSUOKA, S., & Fujita, H. (1998) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(98)00176-x · Cited by 36 · cited 1×
“Their ability to reduce nitrite was explored to avoid the potential toxicity problem encountered when supplementing with nitrate alone (Takahashi et al., 1998; Perdok et al., 2011).”
Dore, J. M., Morvan, B., Rieu-Lesme, F., Goderel, I., Gouet, P., & Pochart, P. (1995) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/0378-1097(95)00176-6 · Cited by 35
Krause, D. O., Bunch, R. J., Conlan, L. L., Kennedy, P. M., Smith, W. J. M., Mackie, R. I., & McSweeney, C. S. (2001) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-147-7-1719 · Cited by 33
Asanuma, N., Iwamoto, M., Kawato, M., & Hino, T. (2002) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1344-3941.2002.00028.x · Cited by 30 · cited 1×
“The major nitrate-reducing bacteria W.succinogenesand S.ruminantium are both present at a concentration of 10 6 cells/ml of rumen fl uid (Asanuma et al., 2002; Yoshii et al., 2003).”
Effect of nisin on ruminal methane production and nitrate/nitrite reduction in vitro
Sar, C., Mwenya, B., Pen, B., Morikawa, R., Takaura, K., Kobayashi, T., & Takahashi, J. (2005) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar04294 · Cited by 25
Formate Metabolism by Ruminal Microorganisms in Relation to Methanogenesis
Asanuma, N., Iwamoto, M., & Hino, T. (1998) · Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho · doi:10.2508/chikusan.69.576 · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“succinogenes and Anaerovibrio lipolytica also can consume formate (Asanuma et al., 1998).”
Archaea in the foregut of macropod marsupials: PCR and amplicon sequence-based observations
Klieve, A. V., Ouwerkerk, D., & Maguire, A. J. (2012) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05428.x · Cited by 23 · cited 1×
“Also, Klieve et al. (2012) identi fi ed clones related to CH 4 -oxidising archaea in the rumen of cows.”
Reina, A. S. A., Tanaka, A., Uehara, A., Shinzato, I., TORIDE, Y., Usui, N., Hirakawa, K., & Takahashi, J. (2010) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2010.90444 · Cited by 20 · cited 2×
“plantarum strain decreased methanogenesis by 90% (Asa et al., 2010).”
Toxicity of Nitrates and Nitrites to Dairy Cattle
Morris, M. P., Cancel, B., & González-Más, A. (1958) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(58)90987-1 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“Methemoglobinemia decreases the blood’s capacity to transport oxygen to tissues, resulting in depressed performances and, in severe cases, death of the animal (Morris et al., 1958).”
Paul, S. S., Deb, S. M., & Singh, D. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.062 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“The CH 4 production at 72 h was decreased from 2.66 to 1.64 mmol/g digested dry matter (DM) without H 2 S accumulation (Paul et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialYoshii, T., Asanuma, N., & Hino, T. (2003) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1344-3941.2003.00142.x · Cited by 17 · cited 2×
“The major nitrate-reducing bacteria W.succinogenesand S.ruminantium are both present at a concentration of 10 6 cells/ml of rumen fl uid (Asanuma et al., 2002; Yoshii et al., 2003).”
The binding and degradation of nisin by mixed ruminal bacteria1
Lee, S. S., Mantovani, H. C., & Russell, J. B. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb01023.x · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“However, nisin is susceptible to rumen proteases (Lee et al., 2002a) limiting its utilisation in vivo.”
The binding and degradation of nisin by mixed ruminal bacteria
Lee, S. I. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(02)00321-5 · Cited by 7
Boccazzi, P., & Patterson, J. (1996) · Annales de Zootechnie · doi:10.1051/animres:19960661 · Cited by 2 · cited 2×
“Homoacetogens have been shown to sustain a functional rumen in methanogen-free lambs (Fonty et al., 2007) and studies have already shown that by inhibiting methanogenesis, the acetogenesis can be stimulated (Boccazzi and Patterson, 1996; Nollet et al., 1997).”
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Asanuma, 2003, Isolation of new nitrite-reducing bacteria, and augmentation of nitrite reduction in the rumen by introducing one of the isolated bacteria, Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture-Meiji University, 137, 1
- Boccazzi, 2011, Using hydrogen-limited anaerobic continuous culture to isolate low hydrogen threshhold ruminal acetogenic bacteria, Agriculture, Food and Analytical Bacteriology, 1, 33
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huws, S. A., Creevey, C. J., Oyama, L. B., Mizrahi, I., Denman, S. E., Popova, M., Muñoz-Tamayo, R., Forano, E., Waters, S. M., Hess, M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161 · Cited by 487
“Feeding live microorganisms to ruminants is not a novel concept and extensive work has been published on the use of “direct-fedmicrobials” (DFM;Martin andNisbet, 1992; Jeyanathan et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWeimer, P. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00296 · Cited by 487
“Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the methanogenesis/acetogenesis story is the fact that, as pointed out by Jeyanathan et al. (2014) acetogens can outcompete methanogens in the gut environments of some non-ruminant animals ranging from termites to wallabies to humans.”
BackgroundMetabolic Hydrogen Flows in Rumen Fermentation: Principles and Possibilities of Interventions
Ungerfeld, E. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00589 · Cited by 472
Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review
Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Abecia, L., & Newbold, C. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01133 · Cited by 336
Invited review: current enteric methane mitigation options
Beauchemin, K. A., Ungerfeld, E. M., Abdalla, A. L., Alvarez, C., Arndt, C., Becquet, P., Benchaar, C., Berndt, A., Mauricio, R. M., McAllister, T. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2022-22091 · Cited by 324
“Effects of yeasts, A. oryzae, and lactic acid bacteria on CH4 production are variable, which might be expected as they have not been selected for their ability to mitigate CH4 production (Jeyanathan et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeyanathan, J., Martin, C., & Morgavi, D. P.
- Affiliations
- VetAgro Sup (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Jeyanathan, J.
- Venue
- animal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-261
- ISSN
- 1751-7311 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147106437
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- animal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Danone
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- direct-fed microbials, ruminant methane emissions, rumen methanogenesis, methane mitigation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, hydrogen scavenging, homoacetogenesis, nitrate reduction, sulfate reduction, methanotrophy, methanogen inhibition, feed fermentation, energy retention
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Digestion, Methane, Models, Biological, Propionates, Ruminants, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Succinic Acid, Probiotics, Biosynthetic Pathways, Global Warming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review