The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Therapy discontinuation in a primary care psychological service: why patients drop out
Abstract
The present study aimed to explore patients’ experience with an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service, and to investigate the reasons for discontinuing their treatment. A qualitative approach was adopted using thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews carried out with 818 patients attending for treatment in Talking Change from November 2015 to January 2019, retrospectively. The five main themes that emerged from the study were: ‘Felt better’, ‘Issues with group settings’, ‘Therapeutic alliance breakdown’, ‘Miscommunication’ and ‘Impracticalities’. The qualitative study uncovered a wide range of reasons for people who had dropped out from their treatment. The findings mainly emphasised general dissatisfaction and inconvenient appointments. However, improvement in symptoms of depression and anxiety was also identified as a key factor among patients who discontinued their treatment. This recovery is known as ‘progress withdrawal’ in which patients withdraw from treatment early due to good therapeutic progress. We present clinical and procedural implications arising from these themes. Key learning aims: (1) To explore what can cause discontinuation of therapy. (2) To obtain the experience of people who have received treatment and dropped out from Talking Change Psychological Therapy services. (3) To explore whether people recovered as part of the treatment withdrawal and what may have helped towards that recovery.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is significant research into people's negative experiences with therapy, ranging from therapeutic alliance breakdown to poor treatment results, negative treatment experiences, group therapy issues, and accessibility issues.
“Indeed, there is significant research into people's negative experiences with therapy (Vybiral et al., 2024 andGhaemian et al., 2020 for examples) ranging from issues around relationships with the therapist/breakdown in the therapeutic alliance, to poor treatment results, negative treatment experiences, issues with group therapy, and impracticalities/accessibility issues with therapeutic appoint”
From Artificial intelligence and unconditional love: the rise of generative AI as an alternative form of mental health support (2026) · cites this paper as Ghaemian et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
Clark, D. M. (2011) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2011.606803 · Cited by 699
Mind the gap: improving the dissemination of CBT
Shafran, R., Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., Arntz, A., Barlow, D. H., Ehlers, A., Freeston, M., Garety, P. A., Hollon, S. D., Ost, L. G., et al. (2009) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.003 · Cited by 569
Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Mental Health Problems: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., Weissman, M. M., Ravitz, P., & Cristea, I. A. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15091141 · Cited by 283
Self‐administered treatment in stepped‐care models of depression treatment
Scogin, F. R., Hanson, A., & Welsh, D. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.10133 · Cited by 186
Dropout prediction in cognitive behavior therapy for panic disorder
Keijsers, G. P. J., Kampman, M., & Hoogduin, C. A. L. (2001) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(01)80018-6 · Cited by 65
Marie Lincoln, T., Rief, W., Hahlweg, K., Frank, M., Witzleben, I. V., Schroeder, B., & Fiegenbaum, W. (2005) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300512331387834 · Cited by 58
Grant, K., McMeekin, E., Jamieson, R., Fairfull, A., Miller, C., & White, J. (2012) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465811000476 · Cited by 30
Karekla, M., Constantinou, P., Ioannou, M., Gloster, A. T., & Kareklas, I. (2019) · Clinical Psychology in Europe · doi:10.32872/cpe.v1i3.33058 · Cited by 29
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Shapiro, 1994, Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation, Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357
- 10.1002/cpp.2028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.06.005 · DOI
- 10.1348/147608305X39491 · DOI
- 10.1037/tra0000062 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80119-2 · DOI
- 10.5042/jmhtep.2010.0364 · DOI
- 10.3109/09540261.2011.606803 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1352465813000544 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1754470X15000148 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eat.20956 · DOI
- 10.1108/MHRJ-12-2015-0038 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5964/ejcop.v6i1.85 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1352465813000544 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000004078.93012.7d · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0021175 · DOI
- 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101057 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brat.2013.01.006 · DOI
- 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01073.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Development and validation of the Readiness for Therapy Questionnaire (RTQ)
Ghomi, M., Wrightman, M., Ghaemian, A., Grey, N., Pickup, T., & Richardson, T. (2021) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465820000764 · Cited by 18
Self-citationMiller, V., Hill, M. J., & Moreira, T. (2026) · Communication and Change · doi:10.1007/s44382-026-00036-1 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghaemian, A., Ghomi, M., Wrightman, M., & Ellis-Nee, C.
- Venue
- The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 1754-470X
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 10
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review