Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapy discontinuation in a primary care psychological service: why patients drop out

Ghaemian, Aisan, Ghomi, Mahdi, Wrightman, Miles, Ellis-Nee, Colm·2020·The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist

Abstract

The present study aimed to explore patients’ experience with an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service, and to investigate the reasons for discontinuing their treatment. A qualitative approach was adopted using thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews carried out with 818 patients attending for treatment in Talking Change from November 2015 to January 2019, retrospectively. The five main themes that emerged from the study were: ‘Felt better’, ‘Issues with group settings’, ‘Therapeutic alliance breakdown’, ‘Miscommunication’ and ‘Impracticalities’. The qualitative study uncovered a wide range of reasons for people who had dropped out from their treatment. The findings mainly emphasised general dissatisfaction and inconvenient appointments. However, improvement in symptoms of depression and anxiety was also identified as a key factor among patients who discontinued their treatment. This recovery is known as ‘progress withdrawal’ in which patients withdraw from treatment early due to good therapeutic progress. We present clinical and procedural implications arising from these themes. Key learning aims: (1) To explore what can cause discontinuation of therapy. (2) To obtain the experience of people who have received treatment and dropped out from Talking Change Psychological Therapy services. (3) To explore whether people recovered as part of the treatment withdrawal and what may have helped towards that recovery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1754470x20000240

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is significant research into people's negative experiences with therapy, ranging from therapeutic alliance breakdown to poor treatment results, negative treatment experiences, group therapy issues, and accessibility issues.

    “Indeed, there is significant research into people's negative experiences with therapy (Vybiral et al., 2024 andGhaemian et al., 2020 for examples) ranging from issues around relationships with the therapist/breakdown in the therapeutic alliance, to poor treatment results, negative treatment experiences, issues with group therapy, and impracticalities/accessibility issues with therapeutic appoint”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Shapiro, 1994, Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation, Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357
  2. 10.1002/cpp.2028 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.06.005 · DOI
  4. 10.1348/147608305X39491 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/tra0000062 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80119-2 · DOI
  7. 10.5042/jmhtep.2010.0364 · DOI
  8. 10.3109/09540261.2011.606803 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1017/S1352465813000544 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S1754470X15000148 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/eat.20956 · DOI
  13. 10.1108/MHRJ-12-2015-0038 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.5964/ejcop.v6i1.85 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S1352465813000544 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000004078.93012.7d · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1037/a0021175 · DOI
  20. 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101057 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.brat.2013.01.006 · DOI
  22. 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01073.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ghaemian, A., Ghomi, M., Wrightman, M., & Ellis-Nee, C.
Venue
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Published
2020
Volume
13
ISSN
1754-470X
Cited by
14
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review