Cited by 283Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Mental Health Problems: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Open access
Cuijpers, Pim, Donker, Tara, Weissman, Myrna M., Ravitz, Paula, Cristea, Ioana A.·2016·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) has been developed for the treatment of depression but has been examined for several other mental disorders. A comprehensive meta-analysis of all randomized trials examining the effects of IPT for all mental health problems was conducted. METHOD: Searches in PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and Cochrane were conducted to identify all trials examining IPT for any mental health problem. RESULTS: Ninety studies with 11,434 participants were included. IPT for acute-phase depression had moderate-to-large effects compared with control groups (g=0.60; 95% CI=0.45-0.75). No significant difference was found with other therapies (differential g=0.06) and pharmacotherapy (g=-0.13). Combined treatment was more effective than IPT alone (g=0.24). IPT in subthreshold depression significantly prevented the onset of major depression, and maintenance IPT significantly reduced relapse. IPT had significant effects on eating disorders, but the effects are probably slightly smaller than those of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in the acute phase of treatment. In anxiety disorders, IPT had large effects compared with control groups, and there is no evidence that IPT was less effective than CBT. There was risk of bias as defined by the Cochrane Collaboration in the majority of studies. There was little indication that the presence of bias influenced outcome. CONCLUSIONS: IPT is effective in the acute treatment of depression and may be effective in the prevention of new depressive disorders and in preventing relapse. IPT may also be effective in the treatment of eating disorders and anxiety disorders and has shown promising effects in some other mental health disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15091141

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mufson L, Dorta KP, Wickramaratne P, et al: A randomized effec- tiveness trial of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed ado- lescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:577-584
  2. Finkenzeller W, Zobel I, Rietz S, et al: Interpersonal psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for post-stroke depression: feasibility and effectiveness. Nervenarzt 2009; 80:805-812

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., Weissman, M. M., Ravitz, P., & Cristea, I. A.
Affiliations
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
173
Issue
7
Pages
680-687
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2322988647
Cited by
283
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 4
FWCI
43.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
interpersonal psychotherapy, depression, subthreshold depression, depression prevention, relapse prevention, eating disorders, anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy comparison, drug therapy comparison, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review