Cited by 7Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealthcare Systems and ReformsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Making universal health coverage a reality: bridging the gap between global mental health and practical integration into local health systems

Open access
Eaton, J., Ryan, G.·2017·Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s2045796016001001

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eaton, J., & Ryan, G.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Eaton, J.
Venue
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Published
2016-12-22
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
245-247
ISSN
  • 2045-7960 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7979
OpenAlex
W2563139768
Cited by
7
References
14
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
universal health coverage, global mental health, mental health services, mental health policy, health system strengthening
MeSH terms
Community Mental Health Centers, Developing Countries, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Global Health, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Insurance Coverage, Universal Health Insurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review