Cited by 2,494Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeGlobal Health and Epidemiology

Estimating the true global burden of mental illness

Open access
Vigo, Daniel, Thornicroft, Graham, Atun, Rifat·2016·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

We argue that the global burden of mental illness is underestimated and examine the reasons for under-estimation to identify five main causes: overlap between psychiatric and neurological disorders; the grouping of suicide and self-harm as a separate category; conflation of all chronic pain syndromes with musculoskeletal disorders; exclusion of personality disorders from disease burden calculations; and inadequate consideration of the contribution of severe mental illness to mortality from associated causes. Using published data, we estimate the disease burden for mental illness to show that the global burden of mental illness accounts for 32·4% of years lived with disability (YLDs) and 13·0% of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), instead of the earlier estimates suggesting 21·2% of YLDs and 7·1% of DALYs. Currently used approaches underestimate the burden of mental illness by more than a third. Our estimates place mental illness a distant first in global burden of disease in terms of YLDs, and level with cardiovascular and circulatory diseases in terms of DALYs. The unacceptable apathy of governments and funders of global health must be overcome to mitigate the human, social, and economic costs of mental illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00505-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vigo, D., Thornicroft, G., & Atun, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Atun, Rifat
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
171-178
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2266871031
Cited by
2,494
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 205 · 2025: 261 · 2024: 267 · 2023: 346 · 2022: 311 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 291 · 2019: 234 · 2018: 153 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 23
FWCI
24.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (FP7/2007–2013, NF-SI-0611-10053)
  • King's College London
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Global Health and Epidemiology
Keywords
disability-adjusted life years, years lived with disability, suicide and self-harm, chronic pain syndromes, musculoskeletal disorders, personality disorders, global health financing
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review