Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Septic Shock: A Genomewide Association Study and Polygenic Risk Score Analysis

D’Urso, Shannon, Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn, Peach, Elizabeth, de Guzman, Erika, Li, Qiang, Medland, Sarah E., Gordon, Scott D., Martin, Nicholas G., CHARGE Inflammation Working Group, Ligthart, Symen, Brown, Matthew A., Powell, Joseph, McArthur, Colin, Rhodes, Andrew, Meyer, Jason, Finfer, Simon, Myburgh, John, Blumenthal, Antje, Cohen, Jeremy, Venkatesh, Balasubramanian, Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Evans, David M.·2020·Twin Research and Human Genetics

Abstract

Previous genetic association studies have failed to identify loci robustly associated with sepsis, and there have been no published genetic association studies or polygenic risk score analyses of patients with septic shock, despite evidence suggesting genetic factors may be involved. We systematically collected genotype and clinical outcome data in the context of a randomized controlled trial from patients with septic shock to enrich the presence of disease-associated genetic variants. We performed genomewide association studies of susceptibility and mortality in septic shock using 493 patients with septic shock and 2442 population controls, and polygenic risk score analysis to assess genetic overlap between septic shock risk/mortality with clinically relevant traits. One variant, rs9489328, located in AL589740 . 1 noncoding RNA, was significantly associated with septic shock ( p = 1.05 × 10 –10 ); however, it is likely a false-positive. We were unable to replicate variants previously reported to be associated ( p < 1.00 × 10 –6 in previous scans) with susceptibility to and mortality from sepsis. Polygenic risk scores for hematocrit and granulocyte count were negatively associated with 28-day mortality ( p = 3.04 × 10 –3 ; p = 2.29 × 10 –3 ), and scores for C-reactive protein levels were positively associated with susceptibility to septic shock ( p = 1.44 × 10 –3 ). Results suggest that common variants of large effect do not influence septic shock susceptibility, mortality and resolution; however, genetic predispositions to clinically relevant traits are significantly associated with increased susceptibility and mortality in septic individuals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/thg.2020.60

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70290-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1056/NEJM198803243181202 · DOI
  4. Cuéllar-Partida, 2019, Complex-traits genetics virtual lab: A community-driven web platform for post-GWAS analyses, bioRxiv, 518027
  5. 10.1038/ng.3211 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/gepi.21699 · DOI
  7. 10.2337/db16-1253 · DOI
  8. 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311545 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.043 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.4049/jimmunol.1800565 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003919 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41588-018-0303-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/nar/gkw1133 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/ng.3897 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/ng.873 · DOI
  20. 10.1086/431587 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.042 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/hmg/ddy271 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.09.009 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Johnson, 2017, GAS Power Calculator: Web-based power calculator for genetic association studies, bioRxiv, 164343
  26. 10.1186/cc6811 · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048307 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/srep32894 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/cc13728 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/ije/dyg070 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ehret, 2011, Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk, Nature, 478, 103, 10.1038/nature10405 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
D’Urso, S., Rajbhandari, D., Peach, E., de Guzman, E., Li, Q., Medland, S. E., Gordon, S. D., Martin, N. G., CHARGE Inflammation Working Group, Ligthart, S., Brown, M. A., Powell, J., McArthur, C., Rhodes, A., Meyer, J., Finfer, S., Myburgh, J., Blumenthal, A., Cohen, J., Venkatesh, B., Cuellar-Partida, G., & Evans, D. M.
Venue
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Published
2020-08
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
204-213
ISSN
  • 1832-4274
  • 1839-2628
Cited by
16
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review