Cited by 824Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Biological interpretation of genome-wide association studies using predicted gene functions

Open access
Pers, Tune H., Karjalainen, Juha M., Chan, Yingleong, Westra, Harm-Jan, Wood, Andrew R., Yang, Jian, Lui, Julian C., Vedantam, Sailaja +10 more·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

The main challenge for gaining biological insights from genetic associations is identifying which genes and pathways explain the associations. Here we present DEPICT, an integrative tool that employs predicted gene functions to systematically prioritize the most likely causal genes at associated loci, highlight enriched pathways and identify tissues/cell types where genes from associated loci are highly expressed. DEPICT is not limited to genes with established functions and prioritizes relevant gene sets for many phenotypes. Identifying which genes and pathways explain genetic associations is challenging. Here, the authors present DEPICT, a tool for gene prioritization, pathway analysis and tissue/cell-type enrichment analysis that can be used to generate testable hypotheses from genetic association studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms6890

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the standard false discovery rate threshold of 5%, DEPICT prioritizes 1,838 genes, a tenfold increase relative to the earlier GWAS of EduYears.

    “At the standard false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 5%, the bioinformatics tool DEPICT19 prioritizes 1,838 genes (Supplementary Table 7), a tenfold increase relative to the DEPICT results from an earlier GWAS of EduYears10.”
  • Genes near the lead SNPs are overwhelmingly enriched for expression in the central nervous system.

    “we applied the bioinformatics tool DEPICT19 and found that, relative to other genes, genes near our lead SNPs are overwhelmingly enriched for expression in the central nervous system (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table 6).”
  • CLECL1 has previously been linked to altered CLECL1 RNA expression in monocytes.

    “On the other hand, CLECL1 represents a simpler case of a known susceptibility effect that has previously been linked to altered CLECL1 RNA expression in monocytes (26, 32); its enrichment in microglial cells, which share many molecular pathways with other myeloid cells, is more straightforward to understand.”

    From Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility (2019) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Methods (Gene prioritization benchmark; page unavailable) discusses genes whose transcription is regulated in whole blood, but does not identify CLECL1 or report altered CLECL1 RNA expression in monocytes. Searches for CLECL1 and monocyte expression found no passage addressing that specific link. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Suggestive evidence for enrichment (FDR≤0.2) was observed for ten tissues, including female genitalia, uterus, endocrine glands, endometrium, ovary and Fallopian tubes.

    “Additionally, suggestive evidence for enrichment (FDR≤0.2) was observed for ten tissues, including female genitalia, uterus, endocrine glands, endometrium, ovary and Fallopian tubes (Supplementary Data 16).”
  • When using results with evidence of genome-wide suggestive association (P<1 × 10−5) in either all or Grade B meta-analysis, DEPICT provided evidence for significant enrichment (FDR≤0.05) of COPB1 PPI subnetwork gene set.

    “However, when using results with evidence of genome-wide suggestive association (P<1 × 10−5) in either all or Grade B meta-analysis, DEPICT provided evidence for significant enrichment (FDR≤0.05) of COPB1 PPI subnetwork gene set (Supplementary Data 16).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pers, T. H., Karjalainen, J. M., Chan, Y., Westra, H.-J., Wood, A. R., Yang, J., Lui, J. C., Vedantam, S., Gustafsson, S., Esko, T., Frayling, T., Speliotes, E. K., Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) Consortium, Boehnke, M., Raychaudhuri, S., Fehrmann, R. S. N., Hirschhorn, J. N., & Franke, L.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Pers, Tune H.
  • Hirschhorn, Joel N.
  • Franke, Lude
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-01-19
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
5890-5890
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125972459
Cited by
787
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 26
FWCI
33.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (098395)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10170, NF-SI-0611-10219, NF-SI-0514-10027, NF-SI-0513-10059)
  • European Commission (259867)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FP7 2007-2013, 916·10·135, 14374, 10135)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R190 2014-3904)
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
  • Alfred Benzon Foundation
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14OC0010513, NNF13OC0005785)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ar063759-07, FP7/2007-2013)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K013351/1, MR/K006584/1, MR/N01104X/1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL117078)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA071789)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U01GM092691)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK075787, P30DK020572)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (UH2AR067677, R01-AR063759)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
genome-wide association study, gene prioritization, pathway enrichment, causal genes, hypothesis generation
MeSH terms
Software, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review