The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Microscale Electrospray Interface for Online, Capillary Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Complex Peptide Mixtures
Abstract
A microcapillary liquid chromatography (HPLC) system designed for the gradient elution of peptide and protein samples at flow rates < 1 microL/min has been coupled to a triple-sector quadrupole mass spectrometer via a simple sheathless electrospray interface (microspray). The microspray interface used a flame-drawn, uncoated, fused silica needle with tip outer diameters in the range of 15-20 microm and an opening less than 5 microm in diameter. Online sample filtration to prevent clogging of the drawn needle was accomplished by using a hydrophilic PVDF membrane filter integrated into the needle assembly. The spray potential (0.5-1 kV) was applied directly to the sample stream through the capillary union. Stable electrospray conditions were obtained over the full range of the gradient (0-90% acetonitrile in water) and was generally independent of flow rate. Both off-line and online analyses of proteins and peptide digest mixtures were performed at sample levels less than 10 fmol. HPLC parameters could be optimized for either rapid LC/MS analysis or enhanced performance in LC/MS/MS experiments by modulation of the eluting peak widths. Additionally, flow could be greatly reduced as selected components pass through the interface to prolong the time available to collect mass spectral data. The reduced spectral background and peak width manipulation facilitated the acquisition of peptide production spectra (MS/MS) using real-time, automated instrument control procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Daniels, D. A., Chen, H., Hicke, B. J., Swiderek, K. M., & Gold, L. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2136683100 · Cited by 567
Chen, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, X., & Qiu, C. (2008) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.026 · Cited by 316
Ducret, A., Oostveen, I. V., Eng, J. K., Yates, J. R., & Aebersold, R. (1998) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560070320 · Cited by 310
Martin, S. E., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F., & Marto, J. A. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac000497v · Cited by 276
The Revolution and Evolution of Shotgun Proteomics for Large-Scale Proteome Analysis
Yates, J. R. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3094313 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, M. T., Stahl, D. C., Hefta, S. A., & Lee, T. D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-12-15
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4549-4556
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1984302889
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Microscale Electrospray Interface for Online, Capillary Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Complex Peptide Mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac00120a019
- The paper
- Davis, M. T., Stahl, D. C., Hefta, S. A., & Lee, T. D. (1995). A Microscale Electrospray Interface for Online, Capillary Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Complex Peptide Mixtures. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00120a019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.